1. Penetrating orbital injuries;C, Spoor T.,1988
2. Computed tomography in penetrating wounds of the orbit with retained foreign bodies;A., Weisman R.; J., Savino P.; L., Schut; N, Schatz;Archives of Otolaryngology,1983
3. Localisation of suspected intraocular foreign bodies with a modified delta 2020 scanner;L., Wilhelm J.; N., Zakov; A., Weinstein M.; A., Berlin L.; H., Zegarra; A, Gutman F.;Ophthalmic Surgery,1981
4. Ferromagnetism of intraocular foreign body causes unilateral blindness after MR study;M., Kelly W.; G., Paglen P.; A., Pearson J.; G., San Diego A.; A, Solomon M.;American Journal of Neuroradiology,1986
5. Management of wooden foreign bodies in the orbit;E., Wesley R.; W., Wahl J.; P., Loden J.; R, Henderson R.;Southern Medical Journal; We conducted a prospective study of patient's understanding of the Patient's Charter. Every patient attending the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department of St Bartholomew's Hospital over a 7-day period was questioned by an interviewer. Those not interviewed by this process were sent a postal questionnaire. A total of 584 patients attended during the study period, from whom 451 data sets were collected, a response rate of 77%. Only 51 patients were aware of The Patient's Charter guarantee of 'immediate assessment'. When asked what they understood by 'immediate', 67% of respondents considered this to mean 15 min or longer. Fifty-four per cent of respondents felt that this assessment should be performed by a nurse. A follow-up study conducted over a 48-h period in January 1994 showed no significant difference in the responses to the same questions,1982