Abstract
Result of the immunohistochemical reactions routinely used in diagnostic surgical pathology should be properly interpreted, since false results, related to technical and interpretative pitfalls may lead to incorrect diagnosis. The main sources of such pitfalls are reviewed, analytically described and related to different steps (fixation, tissue processing and embedding, decalcification, antigen retrieval) which may affect the accuracy of immunohistochemistry. In addition, the presence of endogenous enzyme activity, improper binding of avidin to endogenous biotin, incorrect use of antibodies, chromogen and detection systems, as well as incorrect interpretation may produce unreliable data. The high frequency and extension of such pitfalls make mandatory the use of internal and external controls and adoption of cross-validation programmes. The present study, supported by an extensive review of the related literature, is intended as a guideline leading to proper interpretation of immunohistochemical data, an essential component of the diagnostic process. Experience on the antigen retrieval procedures for different antigens is also presented.
Subject
General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference144 articles.
1. Fixation for the 1990's: a Review of Needs and Accomplishments
2. Hayat MA . Fixation and embedding. In: Hayat M A , ed. Microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and antigen retrieval methods for light and electron microscopy. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic, 2002:71–93.
3. The effect of progressive formaldehyde fixation on the preservation of tissue antigens.;Leong;Pathology,1989
4. A comparison of deformalinizing technics.;Lhotka;Stain Technol,1949
5. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acid.;Srinivasan;Am J Pathol,2002
Cited by
117 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献