Sedation from analgesics: patient preference survey

Author:

Burdon JosephORCID,Fingas Samuel,Parry Rachel,Pitsillides Constantina,Taylor Paul

Abstract

BackgroundThe propensity for certain analgesics to cause sedation is well documented, yet physician–patient dialogue does not routinely include pre-emptive exploration of preferences regarding this side effect.ObjectivesTo investigate the extent to which palliative patients would accept sedation as a side effect of analgesia and to identify factors affecting decision-making.MethodsPatients (n=76) known to a specialist palliative care services were given hypothetical scenarios regarding pain and asked about the acceptability of varying levels of sedation occurring as an analgesic side effect. Demographic data, including diagnosis, performance status and experience of pain and sedation, were collated for evaluation of the influence of these factors on patient opinion.ResultsMost patients (89.47%) would be quite or very likely to accept mild sedation. A significant minority (40.79%) would accept high levels of sedation. There is no significant association with the acceptability of sedation according to demographics. Almost half (40.79%) reported that their responses may change if the prognosis were extended, typically for less sedation with a longer prognosis.ConclusionsIncreasing levels of sedation are less acceptable, although there is significant variation in views. Palliative care patients are likely to indicate preferences regarding their acceptability of sedation. Palliative physicians must explore preferences on an individualised basis.

Publisher

BMJ

Reference15 articles.

1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence . Palliative cancer care – pain; 2021.

2. The Relationship Between Cancer-Related Fatigue and Patient Satisfaction with Quality of Life in Cancer

3. Fatigue, depression and quality of life in cancer patients: how are they related?

4. Leadership Alliance for the care of dying people. One chance to get it right; 2014.

5. Vicarious pain while observing another in pain: an experimental approach;Vandenbroucke;Front Hum Neurosci,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3