Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers

Author:

Bell Sigall K,Roche Stephanie DORCID,Mueller Ariel,Dente Erica,O’Reilly Kristin,Sarnoff Lee Barbara,Sands Kenneth,Talmor Daniel,Brown Samuel M

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known about patient/family comfort voicing care concerns in real time, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU) where stakes are high and time is compressed. Experts advocate patient and family engagement in safety, which will require that patients/families be able to voice concerns. Data on patient/family attitudes and experiences regarding speaking up are sparse, and mostly include reporting events retrospectively, rather than pre-emptively, to try to prevent harm. We aimed to (1) assess patient/family comfort speaking up about common ICU concerns; (2) identify patient/family-perceived barriers to speaking up; and (3) explore factors associated with patient/family comfort speaking up.MethodsIn collaboration with patients/families, we developed a survey to evaluate speaking up attitudes and behaviours. We surveyed current ICU families in person at an urban US academic medical centre, supplemented with a larger national internet sample of individuals with prior ICU experience.Results105/125 (84%) of current families and 1050 internet panel participants with ICU history completed the surveys. Among the current ICU families, 50%–70% expressed hesitancy to voice concerns about possible mistakes, mismatched care goals, confusing/conflicting information and inadequate hand hygiene. Results among prior ICU participants were similar. Half of all respondents reported at least one barrier to voicing concerns, most commonly not wanting to be a ‘troublemaker’, ‘team is too busy’ or ‘I don’t know how’. Older, female participants and those with personal or family employment in healthcare were more likely to report comfort speaking up.ConclusionSpeaking up may be challenging for ICU patients/families. Patient/family education about how to speak up and assurance that raising concerns will not create ‘trouble’ may help promote open discussions about care concerns and possible errors in the ICU.

Funder

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy

Reference68 articles.

1. The National Patient Safety Foundation’s Lucian Leape Institute. Safety is personal: partnering with patients and families for the safest care. Boston: National patient safety foundation. 2014 http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.npsf.org/resource/resmgr/LLI/Safety_Is_Personal.pdf (accessed 15 Mar 2017).

2. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Diagnostic team members and tasks: improving patient engagement and health care professional education and training in diagnosis. In: Balogh EP , Miller BT , Ball JR , eds. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2015:145–216. (accessed 20 Jan 2017).

3. The National Patient Safety Foundation. RCA2: improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm (Version 2). 2016 http://www.npsf.org/?page=rca2 (accessed 20 Jan 2017).

4. Speak Up! Addressing the Paradox Plaguing Patient-Centered Care

5. The National Patient Safety Foundation. National agenda for action: patients and families in patient safety nothing about me, without me. 2003 http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.npsf.org/resource/collection/ABAB3CA8-4E0A-41C5-A480-6DE8B793536C/Nothing_About_Me.pdf (accessed 10 Jun 2017).

Cited by 65 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3