Abstract
In ‘Why Abortion is Immoral’, Don Marquis argues that abortion is wrong for the same reason that murder is wrong, namely, that it deprives a human being of an FLO, a ‘future like ours,’ which is a future full of value and the experience of life. Marquis’ argument rests on the assumption that the human being is somehow deprived by suffering an early death. I argue that Marquis’ argument faces the ‘Epicurean Challenge’. The concept of ‘deprivation’ requires that some discernible individual exists who can be deprived. But if death involves total annihilation, then no discernible individual exists to be so deprived. I argue that the Epicurean Challenge must be addressed before it can be proven that Marquis is correct to claim that abortion and murder are wrong because they deprive someone of an FLO.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference21 articles.
1. Why Abortion is Immoral
2. Marquis D . An argument that abortion is wrong. In: LaFollette H , ed. Ethics in practice. 4th edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014:141–50.
3. Fetuses, futures and values: a reply to Shirley;Marquis;Southwest Philosophy Review,1995
4. Marquis D . A future like ours and the concept of person: a reply to Mcinerney and Paske. In: Pojman LP , Beckwith FJ , eds. The abortion controversy: a reader. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, 1994:354–68.
5. The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献