Development of indicators to measure health system capacity for quality abortion care in 10 countries: a rapid assessment of a measurement framework and indicators
-
Published:2024-05
Issue:1
Volume:2
Page:e000401
-
ISSN:2753-4294
-
Container-title:BMJ Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:bmjph
Author:
Johnston Heidi BartORCID, Rehnstrom Loi UlrikaORCID, Ali Mohamed, Footman KatyORCID, Alinsato Ghislaine Glitho, Aly Eman, Chilanga Asmani, Bansal Shikha, Codjia Laurence, Dkhimi Fahdi, Dlamini-Nqeketo Sithembile, Elamin Hayfa, Gbenou Dina, Gholbzouri Karima, Hedman Lisa, Hemachandra Nilmini, Hien Yelmali, Hyder Md Khurshid Alam, John Theopista, Kansal Amrita, Karna Priya, Läser Laurence, Lavelanet Antonella, Mihretu Belete, Onyiah Pamela Amaka, Ouedraogo Leopold, Qais Sikander, Thom Ellen, Upadhyay Meera, Uzma Qudsia, Zan Souleymane, Ganatra BelaORCID
Abstract
IntroductionA significant gap exists in the availability of indicators and tools to monitor health system capacity for quality abortion care at input and process levels. In this paper, we describe the process and results of developing and assessing indicators to monitor health system capacity strengthening for quality abortion care.MethodsAs part of a 4-year (2019–2022) multicountry project focused on preventing unsafe abortion using a health system strengthening approach in 10 countries, we developed a monitoring framework with indicators and metadata. Through an internal consultative process, we identified a structured list of operational health system capacity indicators for abortion. After implementing the indicators for baseline and annual project monitoring, project staff from 10 teams assessed each indicator using 4 criteria: validity, feasibility, usefulness and importance.ResultsWe identified 30 indicators aligning with 5 of the 6 WHO health system building blocks (excluding service delivery): 6 indicators in leadership and governance, 5 in health workforce, 6 in health information, 8 in access to medicines and health products and 5 in health financing. In our assessment of indicators, average scores against the predetermined criteria were lowest for feasibility (7.7 out of 10) compared with importance (8.5), usefulness (8.9) and validity (9.3). Assessors highlighted the need for fewer and less complex indicators, simplified language, clearer benchmarks, for indicators to be abortion-specific, less subjective and for future frameworks to also include service delivery and research and innovation.ConclusionWe used 30 indicators to monitor health system capacity for quality abortion care in 10 countries and gathered critical feedback that can be used to further strengthen the set of indicators in future work. Establishing core input and process indicators will be critical to inform and support evidence-based policy and programme improvements for quality abortion care.
Funder
UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Anonymous donor
Reference40 articles.
1. Health systems’ capacity to provide post-abortion care: a multicountry analysis using signal functions;Owolabi;Lancet Glob Health,2019 2. Health systems’ preparedness to provide post-abortion care: assessment of health facilities in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Nigeria;Juma;BMC Health Serv Res,2022 3. Boerma T , Abou-Zahr C . Monitoring and evaluation of health system strengthening: an operational framework: Geneva. 2009. 4. Abortion metrics: a scoping review of abortion measures and indicators;Filippi;BMJ Glob Health,2021 5. De Savigny D , Adam T . Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|