Social inequalities in the use of online food delivery services and associations with weight status: cross-sectional analysis of survey and consumer data

Author:

Cummins Steven,Kalbus Alexandra IreneORCID,Cornelsen Laura,Adams Jean,Boyland Emma,Burgoine Thomas,Law Cherry,de Vocht Frank,White Martin,Yau Amy

Abstract

Background Little is known about who uses online food delivery services and how use of these services is associated with social inequalities in food purchasing and diet-related health. This study explored associations between social position and use of online takeaway food and grocery delivery services, and its association with weight status. Methods Data were obtained from households in a consumer research panel living in London and the north of England (n=1521) in February 2019. Use of online grocery delivery services was determined via recorded purchases, and takeaway food delivery app use via survey responses. Social position was approximated through occupation-based social grade and household income. We used logistic regression to estimate the association between social position and use of online delivery services, and the relationship between online delivery service use and weight status. Results Overall, 13.2% of respondents used takeaway food delivery apps over a 7-day period and 15.6% of households used online grocery delivery services over a 4-week period. High-income households were more likely to use online grocery delivery services than low-income households (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.34). In contrast, households with lower social grade were more likely to use takeaway food delivery apps compared with households in the highest grade (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.87). While takeaway food delivery app use was positively associated with living with obesity (relative risk ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.82), use of online grocery delivery services was not. Discussion Findings indicate that use of online food delivery services is patterned by markers of social position and weight status, which may lead to dietary inequalities. The potential impact of increased and differential usage of online delivery services on diet and dietary inequalities warrants further research.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West

UK Medical Research Council

School for Public Health Research

ESRC

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge

Health Data Research UK

National Institute for Health and Care Research Policy Research Programme

BBSRC

Public Health Research Programme

National Institute for Health and Care Research Public Health Policy Research Unit

Publisher

BMJ

Reference44 articles.

1. What role should the commercial food system play in promoting health through better diet?;White;BMJ,2020

2. 2017 diet collaborators. health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017;Lancet,2019

3. NHS Digital . Health Survey for England 2019, 2020. Available: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2019 [Accessed 6 Dec 2021].

4. Future trends in social inequalities in obesity in England;Keaver;J Public Health (Oxf),2020

5. Lewin A . What’s next for on-demand food delivery? Sifted, 2020. Available: https://sifted.eu/articles/on-demand-food-delivery/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3