Antenatal care services in Benin and Tanzania 2021/2022: an equity analysis study

Author:

Ochieng Walter,Munsey Anna,Kinyina Alen,Assenga Melkior,Onikpo Faustin,Binazon Alexandre,Adeyemi Marie,Alao Manzidatou,Aron Sijenunu,Nhiga Samwel,Niemczura Julie,Buekens Julie,Kitojo Chong,Reaves Erik,Husseini Ahmed Saadani,Drake Mary,Wolf Katherine,Suhowatsky Stephanie,Hounto Aurore,Lemwayi Ruth,Gutman JulieORCID

Abstract

IntroductionAntenatal care (ANC) interventions improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, access to ANC may be inequitable due to sociocultural, monetary and time factors. Examining drivers of ANC disparities may identify those amenable to policy change.MethodsWe conducted an ANC services equity analysis in selected public facilities in Geita, Tanzania, where most services are free to the end-user, and Atlantique, Benin, where every visit incurs user fees. Data on total ANC contacts, quality of care (QoC) indicators and wait times were collected from representative household surveys in the catchment of 40 clinics per country and were analysed by education and wealth. We used indices of inequality, concentration indices and Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions to determine the distribution, direction and magnitude of inequalities and their contributing factors. We assessed out-of-pocket expenses and the benefit incidence of government funding.ResultsANC clients in both countries received less than the recommended minimum ANC contacts: 3.41 (95% CI 3.36 to 3.41) in Atlantique and 3.33 (95% CI 3.27 to 3.39) in Geita. Wealthier individuals had more ANC contacts than poorer ones at every education level in both countries; the wealthiest and most educated had two visits more than the poorest, least educated. In Atlantique, ANC attendees receive similar QoC regardless of socioeconomic status. In Geita, there are wide disparities in QoC received by education or wealth. In Atlantique, out-of-pocket expenses for the lowest wealth quintile are 2.7% of annual income compared with 0.8% for the highest, with user fees being the primary expense. In Geita, the values are 3.1% and 0.5%, respectively; transportation is the main expense.ConclusionsInequalities in total ANC visits favouring wealthier, more educated individuals were apparent in both countries. In Atlantique, reduction of user-fees could improve ANC access. In Geita, training and equipping healthcare staff could improve QoC. Community health services could mitigate access barriers.

Funder

President's Malaria Initiative

United States Agency for International Development

Publisher

BMJ

Reference56 articles.

1. World Health Organization . WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience; 2016.

2. Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys;Arsenault;Lancet Glob Health,2018

3. Health equity: challenges in low income countries;Orach;Afr Health Sci,2009

4. Exploring antenatal care utilization and intimate partner violence in benin - are lives at stake?;Idriss-Wheeler;BMC Public Health,2021

5. The effects of geographical accessibility to health facilities on antenatal care and delivery services utilization in Benin: a cross-sectional study;Tanou;Reprod Health,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3