Snapshot of current carotid artery stenting practice and accreditation in the USA

Author:

Sacks David,Farrell Mary BethORCID,Katzen Barry T,Lally Mary,Matsumura Jon S,Merrill Nancy

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this exploratory study was to compare the performance of carotid artery stenting (CAS) best practices between Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) accredited facilities and non-accredited facilities certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).MethodsA random, anonymous survey was sent to CMS and IAC accredited facilities querying facility routine performance of 16 CAS procedure components found in published guidelines and utilised during clinical trials.ResultsThere were 28 responses (response rate=17%). Significant differences were found between the CMS and the IAC facilities for four of 16 procedure measures: determination of modified Rankin Scale score prior to stenting (p=0.012, 95% CI 20% to 80%), accurate measurement of per cent stenosis using electronic callipers (p=0.005, 95% CI 24% to 84%), confirmation of anticoagulation with activated clotting time greater than 250 s prior to crossing the lesion (p=0.03, 95% CI 7% to 69%), and comparison of facility outcomes to accepted benchmarks for stroke and death (p=0.03, 95% CI 7% to 69%). Overall, IAC facilities performed all 16 procedures more frequently (97%) than CMS facilities (66%) (p<0.001, 95% CI 24% to 36%).ConclusionsAlthough the sample size was small, the results demonstrated IAC accredited facilities are more likely to follow best practices, to use quantitative tools to select appropriate patients, and quantitively measure patient-centred clinical outcomes compared with CMS certified facilities. The findings raise the question as to the value of CMS certification versus IAC accreditation as a requirement for reimbursement.

Funder

Intersocietal Accreditation Commission

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference20 articles.

1. U.S. Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services . Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services decision memorandum for carotid artery stenting (CAG-00085R). Available: http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=157 [Accessed 22 Jan 2018].

2. Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: Training and credentialing for carotid stenting—multispecialty consensus recommendations

3. The IAC standards for carotid stenting accreditation. Available: http://www.intersocietal.org/carotid/standards/IACCarotidStentingStandards2014.pdf [Accessed 27 Jan 2018].

4. Carotid artery stenting facilities. Available: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/MedicareApprovedFacilitie/Carotid-Artery-Stenting-Facilities.html [Accessed 22 Jan 2018].

5. Carotid artery stenting: review of technique and update of recent literature;Ahn;Semin Intervent Radiol,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3