How to prioritise in quality improvement? Targeted implementation as a key for quality improvement in Kenyan health facilities
-
Published:2020-11
Issue:4
Volume:9
Page:e001139
-
ISSN:2399-6641
-
Container-title:BMJ Open Quality
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMJ Open Qual
Author:
Nitschke Christine,Nafula Maureen,Brodowski Marc,Marx Irmgard,Kandie Charles,Omogi Irene,Paul-Fariborz Friederike,Szecsenyi Joachim,Brugnara Lucia,Marx Michael
Abstract
BackgroundData from national surveys of low- and middle income countries indicates that there is still a need to improve the quality of healthcare in resource-poor settings. This study aims to understand the benefit of an integral, facility-driven, indicator-based approach used as a decision-making tool to define effective quality improvement interventions in Kenya.ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to understand whether the integral approach developed leads to effective interventions.MethodsCategorical data is collected from ten health facilities covered by the Integrated Quality Management System (IQMS) project in Kenya. First the information on concrete improvement interventions implemented within the facilities is collected and merged into five different intervention topics. Second, groups of facilities with similar quality improvement interventions are selected to compare between the first and second quality assessment rounds. Those IQMS indicators matching the content of the intervention topic are extracted from the software VISOTOOL. In a third step, the data is summarised using means and SD. A one sample T-test is applied on the mean changes and SD. Frequency counts and percentages were used for the presentation of categorical data.ResultsAll improvement interventions resulted in positive and higher change values (T2-T1). Four of five intervention topics, show statistically significant improvements including neonatal mortality (42%; p<0.0001), waiting time (39%; p=0.0490), infection prevention control (28%; p=0.0007) and with shortages of staffing and transport in remote areas (32%; p=0.0194).ConclusionsIn all facilities the interventions selected have a positive impact, some of which markedly improved. It demonstrates that this integral quality improvement approach in Kenya can serve as an effective decision-making tool for identification and prioritisation of interventions. Those targeted interventions, being performed under institutionalisation in form of coaching and tutoring, effectively contribute to improving the quality of care in resource poor settings.
Funder
IQMS quality improvement project
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference28 articles.
1. United Nations . Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, 2015. Available: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
2. The Quality of Medical Care in Low-Income Countries: From Providers to Markets
3. Quality of Private and Public Ambulatory Health Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: Systematic Review of Comparative Studies
4. Banerjee A , Deaton A , Duflo E . Health care delivery in rural Rajasthan. Economic and Political Weekly 2004:944–9.
5. Inequalities in health care use and expenditures: empirical data from eight developing countries and countries in transition;Makinen;Bull World Health Organ,2000
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献