Abstract
BackgroundVirtual consultation has been proposed as a promising tool to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare between primary and specialised care. However, despite its potential facilitators, the evidence on the usefulness of virtual consultation for improving healthcare quality domains is fragmented and unclear. This scoping review aims to assess the impact of virtual consultation on different healthcare quality domains.Material and methodsWe conducted a scoping review with a rigorous search strategy on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria were original articles, reviews, meta-analyses or letters to the editor, published between 1 January 2017 and 24 June 2022, and available in English, Spanish or French. For each of the articles selected, we identified the addressed healthcare quality domains, their facilitators and barriers, areas of improvement and data gaps. We have adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review reporting standards.Results1284 manuscripts were retrieved. Finally, 235 papers were included in this review, most of which were original, descriptive studies. The most evaluated quality domain was effectiveness (223 articles). Safety and patient-centred care were the least evaluated. Simultaneous assessment of more than one domain was observed in 117 papers, being effectiveness and timeliness the most frequent combination. Our analysis revealed that virtual consultation is in development and underused. This tool has the potential to improve access to specialised care and enhance coordination between professionals.ConclusionsVirtual consultation has the potential to provide effective, efficient, equitable and timely attention. However, its contribution to safety and patient-centered care needs further evaluation. Our review emphasises the need for more rigorous research and standardised quality assessment criteria to obtain robust evidence on the usefulness of virtual consultation for improving healthcare quality domains.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference49 articles.
1. Ricur G . Telemedicine: general considerations and clinical areas of application. Electronic health handbook for managers of healthcare services and systems. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC, 2012: 169–93.
2. Martínez A , Rodrígues R , Infante A , et al . Methodological bases to evaluate the viability and the impact of projects of telemedicine. Washington, D.C: Pan American Health Organization, 2001: 1–9.
3. Telediagnosis of oral lesions in primary care: the estomatonet program;Carrard;Oral Dis,2018
4. World Health Organization . Quality of care. Available: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/quality-of-care#tab=tab_1 [Accessed 30 Mar 2023].
5. Institute of Medicine (IOM) . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 2001.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献