Process over outcome quality in paediatrics? An analysis of outpatient healthcare quality indicators for seven common diseases

Author:

Müller TeresaORCID,Mehl Claudia,Nau Thorsten,Bachmann Christian,Geraedts Max

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the scope, quality dimensions and treatment aspects covered by existing quality indicators (QIs) for the somatic diseases bronchial asthma, atopic eczema, otitis media and tonsillitis as well as the psychiatric disorders attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression and conduct disorder in paediatrics.MethodsQIs were identified through an analysis of the guidelines and a systematic search of literature and indicator databases. Subsequently, two researchers independently assigned the QIs to the quality dimensions according to Donabedian and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and to the content categories covering the treatment process.ResultsWe found 1268 QIs for bronchial asthma, 335 QIs for depression, 199 QIs for ADHD, 115 QIs for otitis media, 72 QIs for conduct disorder, 52 QIs for tonsillitis and 50 QIs for atopic eczema. Of these, 78% focused on process quality, 20% on outcome quality and 2% on structural quality. Using OECD criteria, 72% of the QIs were assigned to effectiveness, 17% to patient-centredness, 11% to patient safety and 1% to efficiency. The QIs covered the following categories: diagnostics (30%), therapy (38%), patient-reported outcome measures/ observer-reported outcome measures/patient-reported experience measures (in sum 11%), health monitoring (11%) and office management (11%).ConclusionMost QIs focused on the dimensions of effectiveness and process quality, and on the categories of diagnostics and therapy, with outcome-focused and patient-focused QIs being under-represented. Possible reasons for this striking imbalance could be the easier measurability and clearer assignment of accountability in comparison to the QIs of outcome quality, patient-centredness and patient safety. To produce a more balanced picture of the quality of healthcare, the future development of QIs should prioritise the currently under-represented dimensions.

Funder

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference32 articles.

1. Sens B , Fischer B , Bastek A , et al . Begriffe und konzepte des qualitätsmanagements. GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol 2007;3:Doc05.

2. KBV entwickelt starter-set ambulanter qualitätsindikatoren – AQUIK®-set;Kleudgen;Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen,2011

3. Donabedian A . Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment exploration in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press, 1980.

4. Busse R , Klazinga N , Panteli D , et al . Improving healthcare quality in europe: characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies: european observatory on health systems and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

5. Institute of Medicine . Medicare: A strategy for quality assurance: volume 1. Washington (DC): National Academies Press, 1990.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3