Abstract
IntroductionThe current under-reporting of medical device malfunctions, difficulties with the current system and absence of continuous good-quality data has removed the possibility for constant data interrogation and trend recognition to identify evolving issues. This research used end user experiences aiming to understand causes for the lack of data and knowledge on device performance and associated patient risks. This approach was used to identify existing barriers and methods for improvement.MethodsThis is a qualitative study involving semistructured interviews and surveys with clinicians (15 interviews, 39 surveys) and manufacturers (13 interview participants, 5 surveys). Multiple sources of recruiting were used. Data collected were thematically analysed. Interview results were used to design the surveys. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research was used.ResultsMedical device use is based on personal experience rather than evidence which is scarce. Multiple barriers to reporting were identified alongside patient safety and system related aspects. Furthermore, the acceptable level of error was variable as were effects on working practice. Many workarounds have been developed to overcome problems and have become normalised in daily work. These factors were found to have a limiting impact on improvements and learning. Greater system transparency, feedback on submitted reports, a more efficient system of reporting and better communication with manufacturers were reported as some of the required improvements.ConclusionsThis study has identified numerous complex issues affecting reporting of medical device performance and their subsequent effect on patient safety and clinical staff. The focus on incidents has created many limitations to learning and development. The rich experience of end users should be appropriately used to identify system weaknesses and seek improvement methods. Better communication methods should be developed between healthcare and MedTech (Medical Technologies) industry.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference45 articles.
1. Statistics in the World of Medical Devices: The Contrast with Pharmaceuticals
2. Are the UK systems of innovation and evaluation of medical devices compatible? the role of NICE's medical technologies evaluation programme (MTEP);Chapman;Appl Health Econ Health Policy,2014
3. ABHI . HealthTech for life, 2021. Available: https://www.abhi.org.uk [Accessed 12 May 2021].
4. AAMI-FDA . Infusing patient safety: priority issues from the AAMI/FDA infusion device Summit, 2010.
5. MHRA . Medical devices -adverse incidents reported to MHRA 2011 -2013. MHRA.gov.uk, 2013.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献