Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review

Author:

Murphy Daniel R,Savoy April,Satterly Tyler,Sittig Dean FORCID,Singh Hardeep

Abstract

BackgroundMethods to visualise patient safety data can support effective monitoring of safety events and discovery of trends. While quality dashboards are common, use and impact of dashboards to visualise patient safety event data remains poorly understood.ObjectivesTo understand development, use and direct or indirect impacts of patient safety dashboards.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL for publications between 1 January 1950 and 30 August 2018 involving use of dashboards to display data related to safety targets defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Patient Safety Net. Two reviewers independently reviewed search results for inclusion in analysis and resolved disagreements by consensus. We collected data on development, use and impact via standardised data collection forms and analysed data using descriptive statistics.ResultsLiterature search identified 4624 results which were narrowed to 33 publications after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and consensus across reviewers. Publications included only time series and case study designs and were inpatient focused and emergency department focused. Information on direct impact of dashboards was limited, and only four studies included informatics or human factors principles in development or postimplementation evaluation.DiscussionUse of patient-safety dashboards has grown over the past 15 years, but impact remains poorly understood. Dashboard design processes rarely use informatics or human factors principles to ensure that the available content and navigation assists task completion, communication or decision making.ConclusionDesign and usability evaluation of patient safety dashboards should incorporate informatics and human factors principles. Future assessments should also rigorously explore their potential to support patient safety monitoring including direct or indirect impact on patient safety.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality

Health Services Research and Development

VA National Center for Patient Safety

HSR&D Center for Health Information

National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications

Reference51 articles.

1. Kohn LT , Corrigan JM , Donaldson MS , Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine . To err is human: building a safer health system. The National Academies Press, 2000.

2. Quality payment program. United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Available: https://qpp.cms.gov/ [Accessed 6/6/2021].

3. Hugo JV , S SG . Human factors principles in information Dashboard design. Idaho Falls, ID (United States: Idaho National Lab. (INL), 2016.

4. Dashboards for improving patient care: Review of the literature

5. What do we talk about when we talk about Dashboards?;Sarikaya;IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3