Trends in the method and gestational age of abortion in high-income countries

Author:

Popinchalk AnnaORCID,Sedgh Gilda

Abstract

BackgroundExamining the distribution of abortions by method of abortion and gestational age at time of termination provides insight about the options women may have to terminate their pregnancies. Comparing these distributions across countries and over time is an important step toward understanding the factors that can drive these distributions, including regulations and practices related to the provision of abortion services, and women’s preferences and needs.MethodsWe sought official statistics on gestational age and method of abortion for all high-income countries with liberal abortion laws. For the 24 high-income countries with available data, we calculated percentage distributions of abortions by gestational age of pregnancy and method of abortion for 2017 or the most recent year for which data were available, and assessed trends in the preceding 10 years whenever possible.ResultsMedication (or medical) abortion accounts for at least half of all abortions in the majority of countries. In the majority of countries over 90% of all abortions were completed before 13 weeks, and more than two-thirds of abortions occurred before the first 9 weeks of gestation. Over the past 10 years there has been an increase in both the proportion of abortions that were medication abortions and the proportion that were obtained before 9 weeks gestation.ConclusionsThese findings highlight changes in abortion provision in the past decade. More research is needed to understand whether the observed distributions are a function of women’s preferences or of barriers to the timing and type of care they would prefer.

Funder

Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs

UK Aid from the UK Government

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Reproductive Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends

2. Singh S , Remez L , Sedgh G , et al . Abortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access. Guttmacher Inst 2018 https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-worldwide-2017 (accessed 24 Oct 2018).

3. World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519 (accessed 22 Dec 2017).

4. Center for Reproductive Rights. The World’s Abortion Laws. 2014 https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/AbortionMap2014.PDF (accessed 14 Apr 2017).

5. Jones RK , Jerman J . Time to Appointment and Delays in Accessing Care Among U.S. Abortion Patients. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2016.

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3