Adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis

Author:

Smith Emily RORCID,Oakley Erin,Grandner Gargi Wable,Ferguson Kacey,Farooq Fouzia,Afshar Yalda,Ahlberg Mia,Ahmadzia Homa,Akelo Victor,Aldrovandi Grace,Tippett Barr Beth A,Bevilacqua Elisa,Brandt Justin S,Broutet Nathalie,Fernández Buhigas IreneORCID,Carrillo Jorge,Clifton Rebecca,Conry Jeanne,Cosmi Erich,Crispi Fatima,Crovetto Francesca,Delgado-López CamilleORCID,Divakar Hema,Driscoll Amanda J,Favre Guillaume,Flaherman Valerie J,Gale ChrisORCID,Gil Maria M,Gottlieb Sami L,Gratacós Eduard,Hernandez Olivia,Jones Stephanie,Kalafat Erkan,Khagayi SammyORCID,Knight Marian,Kotloff Karen,Lanzone Antonio,Le Doare Kirsty,Lees Christoph,Litman Ethan,Lokken Erica M,Laurita Longo Valentina,Madhi Shabir A,Magee Laura A,Martinez-Portilla Raigam JafetORCID,McClure Elizabeth M,Metz Tori D,Miller Emily S,Money Deborah,Moungmaithong Sakita,Mullins Edward,Nachega Jean B,Nunes Marta C,Onyango Dickens,Panchaud Alice,Poon Liona C,Raiten Daniel,Regan Lesley,Rukundo Gordon,Sahota Daljit,Sakowicz Allie,Sanin-Blair Jose,Söderling Jonas,Stephansson Olof,Temmerman Marleen,Thorson Anna,Tolosa Jorge E,Townson Julia,Valencia-Prado Miguel,Visentin Silvia,von Dadelszen PeterORCID,Adams Waldorf Kristina,Whitehead Clare,Yassa Murat,Tielsch Jim M

Abstract

IntroductionDespite a growing body of research on the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, there is continued controversy given heterogeneity in the quality and design of published studies.MethodsWe screened ongoing studies in our sequential, prospective meta-analysis. We pooled individual participant data to estimate the absolute and relative risk (RR) of adverse outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with confirmed negative pregnancies. We evaluated the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsWe screened 137 studies and included 12 studies in 12 countries involving 13 136 pregnant women.Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection—as compared with uninfected pregnant women—were at significantly increased risk of maternal mortality (10 studies; n=1490; RR 7.68, 95% CI 1.70 to 34.61); admission to intensive care unit (8 studies; n=6660; RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.03 to 7.17); receiving mechanical ventilation (7 studies; n=4887; RR 15.23, 95% CI 4.32 to 53.71); receiving any critical care (7 studies; n=4735; RR 5.48, 95% CI 2.57 to 11.72); and being diagnosed with pneumonia (6 studies; n=4573; RR 23.46, 95% CI 3.03 to 181.39) and thromboembolic disease (8 studies; n=5146; RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 27.12).Neonates born to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal care unit after birth (7 studies; n=7637; RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.08); be born preterm (7 studies; n=6233; RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.29) or moderately preterm (7 studies; n=6071; RR 2.92, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.54); and to be born low birth weight (12 studies; n=11 930; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40). Infection was not linked to stillbirth. Studies were generally at low or moderate risk of bias.ConclusionsThis analysis indicates that SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal death, severe maternal morbidities and neonatal morbidity, but not stillbirth or intrauterine growth restriction. As more data become available, we will update these findings per the published protocol.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3