Adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis
-
Published:2023-01
Issue:1
Volume:8
Page:e009495
-
ISSN:2059-7908
-
Container-title:BMJ Global Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMJ Glob Health
Author:
Smith Emily RORCID, Oakley Erin, Grandner Gargi Wable, Ferguson Kacey, Farooq Fouzia, Afshar Yalda, Ahlberg Mia, Ahmadzia Homa, Akelo Victor, Aldrovandi Grace, Tippett Barr Beth A, Bevilacqua Elisa, Brandt Justin S, Broutet Nathalie, Fernández Buhigas IreneORCID, Carrillo Jorge, Clifton Rebecca, Conry Jeanne, Cosmi Erich, Crispi Fatima, Crovetto Francesca, Delgado-López CamilleORCID, Divakar Hema, Driscoll Amanda J, Favre Guillaume, Flaherman Valerie J, Gale ChrisORCID, Gil Maria M, Gottlieb Sami L, Gratacós Eduard, Hernandez Olivia, Jones Stephanie, Kalafat Erkan, Khagayi SammyORCID, Knight Marian, Kotloff Karen, Lanzone Antonio, Le Doare Kirsty, Lees Christoph, Litman Ethan, Lokken Erica M, Laurita Longo Valentina, Madhi Shabir A, Magee Laura A, Martinez-Portilla Raigam JafetORCID, McClure Elizabeth M, Metz Tori D, Miller Emily S, Money Deborah, Moungmaithong Sakita, Mullins Edward, Nachega Jean B, Nunes Marta C, Onyango Dickens, Panchaud Alice, Poon Liona C, Raiten Daniel, Regan Lesley, Rukundo Gordon, Sahota Daljit, Sakowicz Allie, Sanin-Blair Jose, Söderling Jonas, Stephansson Olof, Temmerman Marleen, Thorson Anna, Tolosa Jorge E, Townson Julia, Valencia-Prado Miguel, Visentin Silvia, von Dadelszen PeterORCID, Adams Waldorf Kristina, Whitehead Clare, Yassa Murat, Tielsch Jim M
Abstract
IntroductionDespite a growing body of research on the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, there is continued controversy given heterogeneity in the quality and design of published studies.MethodsWe screened ongoing studies in our sequential, prospective meta-analysis. We pooled individual participant data to estimate the absolute and relative risk (RR) of adverse outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with confirmed negative pregnancies. We evaluated the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsWe screened 137 studies and included 12 studies in 12 countries involving 13 136 pregnant women.Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection—as compared with uninfected pregnant women—were at significantly increased risk of maternal mortality (10 studies; n=1490; RR 7.68, 95% CI 1.70 to 34.61); admission to intensive care unit (8 studies; n=6660; RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.03 to 7.17); receiving mechanical ventilation (7 studies; n=4887; RR 15.23, 95% CI 4.32 to 53.71); receiving any critical care (7 studies; n=4735; RR 5.48, 95% CI 2.57 to 11.72); and being diagnosed with pneumonia (6 studies; n=4573; RR 23.46, 95% CI 3.03 to 181.39) and thromboembolic disease (8 studies; n=5146; RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 27.12).Neonates born to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal care unit after birth (7 studies; n=7637; RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.08); be born preterm (7 studies; n=6233; RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.29) or moderately preterm (7 studies; n=6071; RR 2.92, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.54); and to be born low birth weight (12 studies; n=11 930; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40). Infection was not linked to stillbirth. Studies were generally at low or moderate risk of bias.ConclusionsThis analysis indicates that SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal death, severe maternal morbidities and neonatal morbidity, but not stillbirth or intrauterine growth restriction. As more data become available, we will update these findings per the published protocol.
Funder
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Cited by
94 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|