Challenges in reported COVID-19 data: best practices and recommendations for future epidemics

Author:

Badker RinetteORCID,Miller Kierste,Pardee Chris,Oppenheim BenORCID,Stephenson Nicole,Ash Benjamin,Philippsen Tanya,Ngoon Christopher,Savage Partrick,Lam Cathine,Madhav NitaORCID

Abstract

The proliferation of composite data sources tracking the COVID-19 pandemic emphasises the need for such databases during large-scale infectious disease events as well as the potential pitfalls due to the challenges of combining disparate data sources. Multiple organisations have attempted to standardise the compilation of disparate data from multiple sources during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, each composite data source can use a different approach to compile data and address data issues with varying results.We discuss some best practices for researchers endeavouring to create such compilations while discussing three key categories of challenges: (1) data dissemination, which includes discrepant estimates and varying data structures due to multiple agencies and reporting sources generating public health statistics on the same event; (2) data elements, such as date formats and location names, lack standardisation, and differing spatial and temporal resolutions often create challenges when combining sources; and (3) epidemiological factors, including missing data, reporting lags, retrospective data corrections and changes to case definitions that cannot easily be addressed by the data compiler but must be kept in mind when reviewing the data.Efforts to reform the global health data ecosystem should bear such challenges in mind. Standards and best practices should be developed and incorporated to yield more robust, transparent and interoperable data. Since no standards exist yet, we have highlighted key challenges in creating a comprehensive spatiotemporal view of outbreaks from multiple, often discrepant, reporting sources and provided guidelines to address them. In general, we caution against an over-reliance on fully automated systems for integrating surveillance data and strongly advise that epidemiological experts remain engaged in the process of data assessment, integration, validation and interpretation to identify, diagnose and resolve data challenges.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference34 articles.

1. Meadows AJ , Oppenheim B , Guerrero J . Estimating infectious disease underreporting at the country level: a model and application to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ssrn J.doi:10.2139/ssrn.3706059

2. Epidemiological data challenges: planning for a more robust future through data standards;Fairchild;Front Public Health,2018

3. Waldner C . Big data for infectious diseases surveillance and the potential contribution to the investigation of foodborne disease in Canada: an overview and discussion paper. Canada: National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases Winnipeg, 2017.

4. WHO . Weekly epidemiological update, 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19-6-april-2021 [Accessed 13 Apr 2021].

5. EpiJSON: a unified data-format for epidemiology;Finnie;Epidemics,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3