Abstract
ObjectivePsychosocial and economic (socioeconomic) barriers, including poverty, stigma and catastrophic costs, impede access to tuberculosis (TB) services in low-income countries. We aimed to characterise the socioeconomic barriers and facilitators of accessing TB services in Nepal to inform the design of a locally appropriate socioeconomic support intervention for TB-affected households.DesignFrom August 2018 to July 2019, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study consisting of semistructured focus group discussions (FGDs) with purposively selected multisectoral stakeholders. The data were managed in NVivo V.12, coded by consensus and analysed thematically.SettingThe study was conducted in four districts, Makwanpur, Chitwan, Dhanusha and Mahottari, which have a high prevalence of poverty and TB.ParticipantsSeven FGDs were conducted with 54 in-country stakeholders, grouped by stakeholders, including people with TB (n=21), community stakeholders (n=13) and multidisciplinary TB healthcare professionals (n=20) from the National TB Programme.ResultsThe perceived socioeconomic barriers to accessing TB services were: inadequate TB knowledge and advocacy; high food and transportation costs; income loss and stigma. The perceived facilitators to accessing TB care and services were: enhanced championing and awareness-raising about TB and TB services; social protection including health insurance; cash, vouchers and/or nutritional allowance to cover food and travel costs; and psychosocial support and counselling integrated with existing adherence counselling from the National TB Programme.ConclusionThese results suggest that support interventions that integrate TB education, psychosocial counselling and expand on existing cash transfer schemes would be locally appropriate and could address the socioeconomic barriers to accessing and engaging with TB services faced by TB-affected households in Nepal. The findings have been used to inform the design of a socioeconomic support intervention for TB-affected households. The acceptability, feasibility and impact of this intervention on TB-related costs, stigma and TB treatment outcomes, is now being evaluated in a pilot implementation study in Nepal.
Funder
Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
National Institution for Health Research
Academy of Medical Sciences, UK
Swedish Health Research Council, Sweden
EU Horizon2020
Medical Research Council Department for International Development, and Wellcome Trust
Farrar Foundation
Wellcome
Reference65 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Global tuberculosis report. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO), 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/336069/9789240013131-eng.pdf?ua=1
2. Addressing social determinants to end tuberculosis;Wingfield;Lancet,2018
3. Beyond pills and tests: addressing the social determinants of tuberculosis
4. World Health Organization . Implementing the end TB strategy: the essentials. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2015. https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2015/end_tb_essential.pdf?ua=1
5. National Tuberculosis Control Center . Nepal national TB prevalence survey brief, 2020. Available: https://nepalntp.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/NEPAL-NATIONAL-TB-PREVALENCE-SURVEY-BRIEF-March-24-2020.pdf
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献