Measuring supply-side service disruption: a systematic review of the methods for measuring disruption in the context of maternal and newborn health services in low and middle-income settings

Author:

McGowan Catherine RORCID,Gokulakrishnan Dhikshitha,Monaghan Emily,Abdelmagid Nada,Romig Laura,Gallagher Meghan CORCID,Meyers Janet,Cummings Rachael,Cardinal Laura J

Abstract

ObjectivesDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, most essential services experienced some level of disruption. Disruption in LMICs was more severe than in HICs. Early reports suggested that services for maternal and newborn health were disproportionately affected, raising concerns about health equity. Most disruption indicators measure demand-side disruption, or they conflate demand-side and supply-side disruption. There is currently no published guidance on measuring supply-side disruption. The primary objective of this review was to identify methods and approaches used to measure supply-side service disruptions to maternal and newborn health services in the context of COVID-19.DesignWe carried out a systematic review and have created a typology of measurement methods and approaches using narrative synthesis.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Global Health in January 2023. We also searched the grey literature.Eligibility criteriaWe included empirical studies describing the measurement of supply-side service disruption of maternal and newborn health services in LMICs in the context of COVID-19.Data extraction and synthesisWe extracted the aim, method(s), setting, and study outcome(s) from included studies. We synthesised findings by type of measure (ie, provision or quality of services) and methodological approach (ie, qualitative or quantitative).ResultsWe identified 28 studies describing 5 approaches to measuring supply-side disruption: (1) cross-sectional surveys of the nature and experience of supply-side disruption, (2) surveys to measure temporal changes in service provision or quality, (3) surveys to create composite disruption scores, (4) surveys of service users to measure receipt of services, and (5) clinical observation of the provision and quality of services.ConclusionOur review identified methods and approaches for measuring supply-side service disruption of maternal and newborn health services. These indicators provide important information about the causes and extent of supply-side disruption and provide a useful starting point for developing specific guidance on the measurement of service disruption in LMICs.

Funder

United States Agency for International Development

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference57 articles.

1. World health organization . Pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interim report. Geneva WHO; 2020.

2. World Health Organization . Fourth round of the global pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: November 2022–January 2023: interim report. Geneva WHO; 2023.

3. World Health Organization . Maintaining essential health services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context: interim guidance. Geneva WHO; 2020.

4. World Health Organization . Maintaining the provision and use of services for maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and older people during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from 19 countries. Geneva WHO; 2021.

5. World Health Organization . Continuity of essential health services: facility assessment tool. Geneva WHO; 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3