Operational complexities in international clinical trials: a systematic review of challenges and proposed solutions

Author:

Gumber LeherORCID,Agbeleye Opeyemi,Inskip Alex,Fairbairn Ross,Still Madeleine,Ouma Luke,Lozano-Kuehne Jingky,Bardgett Michelle,Isaacs John D,Wason James MSORCID,Craig Dawn,Pratt Arthur GORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveInternational trials can be challenging to operationalise due to incompatibilities between country-specific policies and infrastructures. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the operational complexities of conducting international trials and identify potential solutions for overcoming them.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesMedline, Embase and Health Management Information Consortium were searched from 2006 to 30 January 2023.Eligibility criteriaAll studies reporting operational challenges (eg, site selection, trial management, intervention management, data management) of conducting international trials were included.Data extraction and synthesisSearch results were independently screened by at least two reviewers and data were extracted into a proforma.Results38 studies (35 RCTs, 2 reports and 1 qualitative study) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median sample size was 1202 (IQR 332–4056) and median number of sites was 40 (IQR 13–78). 88.6% of studies had an academic sponsor and 80% were funded through government sources. Operational complexities were particularly reported during trial set-up due to lack of harmonisation in regulatory approvals and in relation to sponsorship structure, with associated budgetary impacts. Additional challenges included site selection, staff training, lengthy contract negotiations, site monitoring, communication, trial oversight, recruitment, data management, drug procurement and distribution, pharmacy involvement and biospecimen processing and transport.ConclusionsInternational collaborative trials are valuable in cases where recruitment may be difficult, diversifying participation and applicability. However, multiple operational and regulatory challenges are encountered when implementing a trial in multiple countries. Careful planning and communication between trials units and investigators, with an emphasis on establishing adequately resourced cross-border sponsorship structures and regulatory approvals, may help to overcome these barriers and realise the benefits of the approach.Open science framework registration numberosf-registrations-yvtjb-v1.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

BMJ

Reference62 articles.

1. Ethical and Scientific Implications of the Globalization of Clinical Research

2. The ethics of global clinical trials

3. Barrios CH , Werutsky G , Martinez-Mesa J . The global conduct of cancer clinical trials: challenges and opportunities. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 2015;e132–139.

4. World Health Organization . WHO COVID-19 solidarity Therapeutics trial. 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments [Accessed 23 Mar 2023].

5. Clinical trials have gone global: is this a good thing;Lang;PLoS Med,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3