Impact of practicing internal benchmarking on continuous improvement of cataract surgery outcomes: a retrospective observational study at Aravind Eye Hospitals, India

Author:

Balu Ganesh-Babu SubburamanORCID,Gupta Sachin,Ravilla Ravindran D,Ravilla Thulasiraj DORCID,Mertens Helen,Webers Carroll,Vasudeva Rao Shyam,van Merode FritsORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aim to assess the effectiveness of a cataract surgery outcome monitoring tool used for continuous quality improvement. The objectives are to study: (1) the quality parameters, (2) the monitoring process followed and (3) the impact on outcomes.Design and proceduresIn this retrospective observational study we evaluated a quality improvement (QI) method which has been practiced at the focal institution since 2012: internal benchmarking of cataract surgery outcomes (CATQA). We evaluated quality parameters, procedures followed and clinical outcomes. We created tables and line charts to examine trends in key outcomes.SettingAravind Eye Care System, India.ParticipantsPhacoemulsification surgeries performed on 718 120 eyes at 10 centres (five tertiary and five secondary eye centres) from 2012 to 2020 were included.InterventionsAn internal benchmarking of surgery outcome parameters, to assess variations among the hospitals and compare with the best hospital.Outcome measuresIntraoperative complications, unaided visual acuity (VA) at postoperative follow-up visit and residual postoperative refractive error (within ±0.5D).ResultsOver the study period the intraoperative complication rate decreased from 1.2% to 0.6%, surgeries with uncorrected VA of 6/12 or better increased from 80.8% to 89.8%, and surgeries with postoperative refractive error within ±0.5D increased from 76.3% to 87.3%. Variability in outcome measures across hospitals declined. Additionally, benchmarking was associated with improvements in facilities, protocols and processes.ConclusionInternal benchmarking was found to be an effective QI method that enabled the practice of evidence-based management and allowed for harnessing the available information. Continuous improvement in clinical outcomes requires systematic and regular review of results, identifying gaps between hospitals, comparisons with the best hospital and implementing lessons learnt from peers.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. World Health Organization, World Bank Group, OECD . Delivering quality health services. 2018. Available: http://apps.who.int/bookorders

2. The demand for health care services in rural Tanzania;Sahn;Oxford Bull Econ & Stats,2003

3. Wellay T , Gebreslassie M , Mesele M , et al . Demand for health care service and associated factors among patients in the community of Tsegedie district, northern Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:697. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3490-2

4. The strategy that will fix health care. 2021. Available: https://hbr.org/2013/10/the-strategy-that-will-fix-health-care

5. Harvard TH . n.d. Using health outcomes research to improve quality of care | executive and continuing professional education. Chan School of Public Health Available: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ecpe/using-health-outcomes-research-to-improve-quality-of-care/

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3