Abstract
ObjectivesTo identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences (‘values integration’) in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).DesignSystematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence.Data sourcesRelevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science).Eligibility criteriaRecords needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients.Data extraction and synthesisRelevant data including participant quotations, authors’ observations, interpretations and conclusions were extracted, synthesised and analysed in a phased approach using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Data Extraction Tool, as well as EPPI Reviewer and NVivo software. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess methodological quality of included records.ResultsThirty-one records involving >1032 HCP participants and 1823 HCP-patient encounters were reviewed. Findings included 143 approaches to values integration in clinical care, thematically analysed and synthesised into four themes: (1)approaches of concern; (2)approaches of competence; (3)approaches of communicationand (4)approaches of congruence. Confidence in the quality of included records was deemed high.ConclusionsHCPs incorporate patient values and preferences in healthcare through a variety of approaches including showing concern for the patient as a person, demonstrating competence at managing diseases, communicating with patients as partners and tailoring, adjusting and balancing overall care. Themes in this review provide a novel framework for understanding and addressing values integration in clinical care and provide useful insights for policymakers, educators and practitioners.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020166002.
Reference88 articles.
1. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
2. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
3. Evidence-Based medicine: what has happened in the past 50 years?;Mellis;J Paediatr Child Health,2015
4. Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences;Gooberman-Hill;Patient,2012
5. Exploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative study;Lee;PLoS One,2013
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献