Bridging that gap: a qualitative study of perceptions of equality, diversity and inclusivity in colorectal surgery in the UK and Ireland

Author:

Harji DeenaORCID,Sarmah Panchali,Gwyther Bethany,Lyons M K,Boereboom Catherine Louise,Siddiqi S,Arnott R,Harikrishnan Athur,Maxwell-Armstrong Charles,Cuming Tamzin

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a growing recognition on the importance of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) within surgery and the need to diversify the surgical community and its various organisations, in a bidto reflect the diverse populations they serve. To create, sustain and encourage a diverse surgical workforce requires an in-depth understanding of the current makeup of key surgical institutions, relevant issues pertaining to EDI and appropriate solutions and strategies to ensure tangible change.ObjectivesFollowing on from the recent Kennedy Review into Diversity and Inclusion commissioned by the Royal College of Surgeons of England, the aim of this qualitative study was to understand the EDI issues which affected the membership of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, while seeking appropriate solutions to address them.DesignDedicated, online and qualitative focus groups.ParticipantsColorectal surgeons, trainees and nurse specialists were recruited using a volunteer sampling strategy.MethodsA series of online, dedicated, qualitative focus groups across the 20 chapter regions were held. Each focus group was run informed by a structured topic guide. All participants who were given the opportunity to remain anonymous were offered a debriefing at the end. This study has been reported in keeping with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.ResultsBetween April and May 2021, a total number of 20 focus groups were conducted, with a total of 260 participants across 19 chapter regions. Seven themes and one standalone code pertaining to EDI were identified: support, unconscious behaviours, psychological consequences, bystander behaviour, preconceptions, inclusivity and meritocracy and the one standalone code was institutional accountability. Five themes were identified pertaining to potential strategies and solutions: education, affirmative action, transparency, professional support and mentorship.ConclusionThe evidence presented here is of a range of EDI issues which affect the working lives of those within colorectal surgery in the UK and Ireland, and of potential strategies and solutions which can help build a more inclusive, equitable and diverse colorectal community.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. The Royal College – Our Professional Home - an independent review on diversity and inclusion for the Royal College of Surgeons of England. n.d. Available: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/about-the-rcs/about-our-mission/diversity-review-2021/

2. Thirty years of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland;Brown;Colorectal Dis,2020

3. Diversity at the heart of the College. n.d. Available: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/about-the-rcs/about-our-mission/diversity/

4. ACPGBI equality statement. n.d. Available: https://www.acpgbi.org.uk/about/acpgbi_equality_statement.aspx

5. Improving Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation in Radiology and Radiation Oncology Part 1: Why These Matter

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3