Can process mapping and a multisite Delphi of perioperative professionals inform our understanding of system-wide factors that may impact operative risk?

Author:

Stubbs DanielORCID,Bashford TomORCID,Gilder Fay,Nourallah Basil,Ercole AriORCID,Levy Nicholas,Clarkson John

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine whether the use of process mapping and a multidisciplinary Delphi can identify potential contributors to perioperative risk. We hypothesised that this approach may identify factors not represented in common perioperative risk tools and give insights of use to future research in this area.DesignMultidisciplinary, modified Delphi study.SettingTwo centres (one tertiary, one secondary) in the UK during 2020 amidst coronavirus pressures.Participants91 stakeholders from 23 professional groups involved in the perioperative care of older patients. Key stakeholder groups were identified via process mapping of local perioperative care pathways.ResultsResponse rate ranged from 51% in round 1 to 19% in round 3. After round 1, free text suggestions from the panel were combined with variables identified from perioperative risk scores. This yielded a total of 410 variables that were voted on in subsequent rounds. Including new suggestions from round two, 468/519 (90%) of the statements presented to the panel reached a consensus decision by the end of round 3. Identified risk factors included patient-level factors (such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status), and organisational or process factors related to the individual hospital (such as policies, staffing and organisational culture). 66/160 (41%) of the new suggestions did not feature in systematic reviews of perioperative risk scores or key process indicators. No factor categorised as ‘organisational’ is currently present in any perioperative risk score.ConclusionsThrough process mapping and a modified Delphi we gained insights into additional factors that may contribute to perioperative risk. Many were absent from currently used risk stratification scores. These results enable an appreciation of the contextual limitations of currently used risk tools and could support future research into the generation of more holistic data sets for the development of perioperative risk assessment tools.

Funder

NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Centre

Wellcome Trust, Grant

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. General Medical Council . Decision making and consent, 2020. Available: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-guidance-for-doctors-decision-making-and-consent-english_pdf-84191055.pdf [Accessed 30 Nov 2021].

2. Nela , Calculator NR . Available: https://data.nela.org.uk/riskcalculator/

3. Lewis G . Next steps for risk stratification in the NHS. NHS England, 2015. Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/nxt-steps-risk-strat-glewis.pdf [Accessed 14 Dec 2021].

4. Risk Stratification Tools for Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

5. Current Risk Adjustment and Comorbidity Index Underperformance in Predicting Post-Acute Utilization and Hospital Readmissions After Joint Replacements: Implications for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3