Understanding potential participation barriers to improve trial design and outcomes: clinical trial simulation in palmoplantar pustulosis as a case study

Author:

Boisvert-Huneault ChristianORCID,Trigos Herraez David,Pinter Andreas,Kobayashi Satomi,Bell Stacie,Kallsen Kimberley,Gloede Tristan,Yagi Nobutaka,Brunette Steven,Datsenko Yakov,Baehner Frank,Clerisme-Beaty Emmanuelle,Van de Kerkhof Peter

Abstract

ObjectivesEvaluate the experiences and perceptions of patients participating in a simulated clinical trial and identify ways to enhance future patient-centric trial designs.DesignInternational, multicentre, non-interventional, virtual clinical trial visits with patient debriefs and advisory boards.SettingVirtual clinic visits and accompanying advisory boards.ParticipantsNine patients with palmoplantar pustulosis for simulated trial visits; 14 patients and patient representatives for advisory boards.Main outcome measuresQualitative responses to trial documentation, visit schedule and logistics, and trial design were collected during patient debriefs. Results were discussed at two virtual advisory board meetings.ResultsPatients identified key barriers to participation and potential difficulties encountered when attending trial visits and completing assessments. They also proposed recommendations to overcome these challenges. Patients recognised the need for comprehensive informed consent forms, but recommended use of non-technical language, brevity and additional support to aid understanding. Other trial documentations should be relevant to the disease and include known efficacy and safety of the study drug. Patients were concerned about receiving placebo, stopping existing medications and being unable to receive the study drug after trial completion; therefore, patients and physicians recommended an open-label extension following trial completion. Trial visits were too numerous (n=20) and too long (3–4 hours each); patients recommended improvements to the design to make best use of their time and reduce unnecessary waiting. They also requested financial and logistical support. Patients expressed a desire for study outcomes that matter to them, related to their ability to undertake normal daily activities and not be a burden to others.ConclusionsSimulated trials are an innovative method for assessing trial design and acceptance from a patient-centric perspective, enabling specific improvements to be made prior to trial initiation. Incorporation of recommendations from simulated trials could enhance trial recruitment and retention, and optimise trial outcomes and data quality.

Funder

Boehringer Ingelheim

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Patient centric approach for clinical trials: current trend and new opportunities;Sharma;Perspect Clin Res,2015

2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). . Patient-focused drug development: collecting comprehensive and representative input. Guidance for industry, Food and Drug Administration staff, and other stakeholders. 2020. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/139088/download [Accessed 10 April 2023].

3. Treweek S , Pitkethly M , Cook J , et al . Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2:MR000013. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6

4. Awwad O , Maaiah S , Almomani BA . Clinical trials: predictors of knowledge and attitudes towards participation. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e13687. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13687

5. Clinical trial recruitment - a complex intervention?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3