Abstract
ObjectivesEvaluate the experiences and perceptions of patients participating in a simulated clinical trial and identify ways to enhance future patient-centric trial designs.DesignInternational, multicentre, non-interventional, virtual clinical trial visits with patient debriefs and advisory boards.SettingVirtual clinic visits and accompanying advisory boards.ParticipantsNine patients with palmoplantar pustulosis for simulated trial visits; 14 patients and patient representatives for advisory boards.Main outcome measuresQualitative responses to trial documentation, visit schedule and logistics, and trial design were collected during patient debriefs. Results were discussed at two virtual advisory board meetings.ResultsPatients identified key barriers to participation and potential difficulties encountered when attending trial visits and completing assessments. They also proposed recommendations to overcome these challenges. Patients recognised the need for comprehensive informed consent forms, but recommended use of non-technical language, brevity and additional support to aid understanding. Other trial documentations should be relevant to the disease and include known efficacy and safety of the study drug. Patients were concerned about receiving placebo, stopping existing medications and being unable to receive the study drug after trial completion; therefore, patients and physicians recommended an open-label extension following trial completion. Trial visits were too numerous (n=20) and too long (3–4 hours each); patients recommended improvements to the design to make best use of their time and reduce unnecessary waiting. They also requested financial and logistical support. Patients expressed a desire for study outcomes that matter to them, related to their ability to undertake normal daily activities and not be a burden to others.ConclusionsSimulated trials are an innovative method for assessing trial design and acceptance from a patient-centric perspective, enabling specific improvements to be made prior to trial initiation. Incorporation of recommendations from simulated trials could enhance trial recruitment and retention, and optimise trial outcomes and data quality.
Reference41 articles.
1. Patient centric approach for clinical trials: current trend and new opportunities;Sharma;Perspect Clin Res,2015
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). . Patient-focused drug development: collecting comprehensive and representative input. Guidance for industry, Food and Drug Administration staff, and other stakeholders. 2020. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/139088/download [Accessed 10 April 2023].
3. Treweek S , Pitkethly M , Cook J , et al . Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2:MR000013. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6
4. Awwad O , Maaiah S , Almomani BA . Clinical trials: predictors of knowledge and attitudes towards participation. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e13687. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13687
5. Clinical trial recruitment - a complex intervention?