Influence of social networks in healthcare on preparation for selection procedures of health professions education: a Dutch interview study

Author:

Mulder LianneORCID,Wouters AnoukORCID,Fikrat-Wevers SuzanneORCID,Koster Andries SORCID,Ravesloot Jan Hindrik,Croiset GerdaORCID,Kusurkar Rashmi AORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesHealth professions education (HPE) students are often not representative of the populations they will serve. The underrepresentation of non-traditional students is problematic because diversity is essential for promoting excellence in health education and care. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of traditional and non-traditional students regarding facilitators and barriers in preparing for HPE selection procedures, and to determine the role of social networks in their decision-making and preparations to apply.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted with 26 Dutch youth who were interested in university-level HPE programmes. Semistructured interviews and sociograms were analysed using thematic analysis, adopting a constructivist approach.ResultsTwenty-six high school students participated, with traditional and non-traditional backgrounds, with and without social networks in healthcare and higher education. Two themes were constructed. First, four high-impact facilitators helped to overcome barriers to apply and in preparation for selection: access to a social network connection working or studying in healthcare, to correct information, to healthcare experience and to a social network connection in higher education. Lack of information was the main barrier while access to social network connections in healthcare was the main facilitator to overcome this barrier. However, this access was unevenly distributed. Second, access alone is not enough: the need for agency to make use of available facilitators is also essential.ConclusionsThe themes are discussed using intersectionality. Traditional students with access to facilitators develop their self-efficacy and agency within social structures that privilege them, whereas non-traditional students must develop those skills without such structures. Our findings provide recommendations for the ways in which universities can remove barriers that cause unequal opportunities to prepare for the selection of HPE programmes. Along with equitable admissions, these recommendations can help to achieve a more representative student population and subsequently a better quality of health education and care.

Funder

Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. Alexander K , Cleland J . Social inclusion or social engineering? The politics and reality of widening access to medicine in the UK. In: Shah M , McKay J , eds. Achieving equity and quality in higher education: global perspectives in an era of widening participation. Springer, 2018: 143–72.

2. The interaction of socio-economic status and gender in widening participation in medicine;Griffin;Med Educ,2015

3. Van den Broek A , de Korte K , Mulder J . Numerus fixus, selectie en kansengelijkheid in Het wetenschappelijk onderwijs, 2018.

4. Van den Broek A , Mulder J , de Korte K . Selectie bij opleidingen met een numerus fixus & de toegankelijkheid van het hoger onderwijs. In: Onderzoek in opdracht van Het Ministerie van OCW, Nijmegen, ResearchNed, 2018.

5. Fair access to medicine? Retrospective analysis of UK medical schools application data 2009-2012 using three measures of socioeconomic status

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3