Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening for women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds; a qualitative study of GPs

Author:

Chandrakumar AbiraORCID,Hoon Elizabeth,Benson Jill,Stocks NigelORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening (CCS) for women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds.DesignQualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews, with interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.SettingAdelaide, South Australia.ParticipantsTwelve GPs with experience in providing CCS to women from CALD backgrounds participated.ResultsFour main themes emerged: ‘importance of clinician–patient relationship’, ‘patients’ cultural understanding regarding health care and CCS’, ‘communication and language’ and ‘health system related’. Each theme had several subthemes. GPs’ professional relationship with their patients and repeated advice from other clinicians, together with the provision of opportunistic CCS, were described as facilitators, and encompassed the theme of ‘importance of clinician–patient relationship’. This theme also raised the possibility of self-collection human papilloma virus tests. Lack of awareness and knowledge, lower priority for cancer screening and patients’ individual circumstances contributed to the theme of ‘patients’ cultural understanding regarding health care and CCS’, and often acted as barriers to CCS. ‘Communication and language’ consisted of language difficulties, interpreter use and use of appropriate resources. Language difficulties were a barrier to the provision of CCS, and GPs used interpreters and written handouts to help overcome this. The theme of ‘health system related’ involved the increased time needed for CCS consults for CALD women, access to appointments, funding, health promotion and effective use of practice management software.ConclusionsThis study highlights that multiple, inter-related barriers and facilitators influence CALD women’s engagement with CCS, and that GPs needed to manage all of these factors in order to encourage CCS participation. More efforts are needed to address the barriers to ensure that GPs have access to appropriate resources, and CALD patients have access to GPs they trust.

Funder

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. World Health Organization . WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention, second edition. Geneva World Health Organization; 2021.

2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . National cervical screening program monitoring report 2020. Canberra AIHW; 2020.

3. Self-Collection for under-screened women in a national cervical screening program: pilot study;Saville;Current oncology,2018

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Cervical screening in Australia 2019; contract No: CAN 124. Canberra AIHW; 2019.

5. Cancer Council NSW . Eliminating cervical cancer in Australia by 2035, 2021. Available: https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/research-pt/eliminating-cervical-cancer-in-australia-by-2035/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3