Impact of a phone call with a medical student/general practitioner team on morbidity of chronic patients during the first French COVID-19 lockdown (COVIQuest): a cluster randomised trial

Author:

Dibao-Dina ClarisseORCID,Léger Julie,Ettori-Ajasse Isabelle,Boivin Estelle,Chambe Juliette,Abou-Mrad-Fricquegnon Karim,Sun SophieORCID,Jego MaevaORCID,Motte Baptiste,Chiron Benoit,Sidorkiewicz Stéphanie,Khau Cam-Anh,Bouchez Tiphanie,Ghali Maria,Bruel Sébastien,Lebeau Jean-Pierre,Camus Vincent,El-Hage Wissam,Angoulvant Denis,Caille Agnès,Guillon-Grammatico Leslie,Laurent Emeline,Saint-Lary Olivier,Boussageon Rémy,Pouchain DenisORCID,Giraudeau Bruno

Abstract

ObjectivesThe first COVID-19 lockdown led to a significantly reduced access to healthcare, which may have increased decompensations in frail patients with chronic diseases, especially older patients living with a chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD) or a mental health disorder (MHD). The objective of COVIQuest was to evaluate whether a general practitioner (GP)-initiated phone call to patients with CVD and MHD during the COVID-19 lockdown could reduce the number of hospitalisation(s) over a 1-month period.DesignThis is a cluster randomised controlled trial. Clusters were GPs from eight French regions.ParticipantsPatients ≥70 years old with chronic CVD (COVIQuest_CV subtrial) or ≥18 years old with MHD (COVIQuest_MH subtrial).InterventionsA standardised GP-initiated phone call aiming to evaluate patients’ need for urgent healthcare, with a control group benefiting from usual care (ie, the contact with the GP was by the patient’s initiative).Main outcome measuresHospital admission within 1 month after the phone call.ResultsIn the COVIQuest_CV subtrial, 131 GPs and 1834 patients were included in the intervention group and 136 GPs and 1510 patients were allocated to the control group. Overall, 65 (3.54%) patients were hospitalised in the intervention group vs 69 (4.57%) in the control group (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.20; risk difference −0.77, 95% CI −2.28 to 0.74). In the COVIQuest_MH subtrial, 136 GPs and 832 patients were included in the intervention group and 131 GPs and 548 patients were allocated to the control group. Overall, 27 (3.25%) patients were hospitalised in the intervention group vs 12 (2.19%) in the control group (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.81; risk difference 1.38, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.70).ConclusionA GP-initiated phone call may have been associated with more hospitalisations within 1 month for patients with MHD, but results lack robustness and significance depending on the statistical approach used.Trial registration numberNCT04359875.

Funder

University Hospital of Tours Endowment Funds

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Bernard Stoecklin S , Rolland P , Silue Y . Investigation team. first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in France: surveillance, investigations and control measures, January 2020. Euro Surveill;2020:6.

2. Preliminary case report on the SARS-CoV-2 cluster in the UK, France, and Spain;Hodcroft;Swiss Med Wkly,2020

3. Monitoring transmissibility and mortality of COVID-19 in Europe;Yuan;Int J Infect Dis,2020

4. Ministère de la Santé . Prise en charge en ville PAR les Médecins de ville des patients symptomatiques en phase épidémique de covid-19, 2020. Available: https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/soins-et-maladies/maladies/maladies-infectieuses/coronavirus/professionnels-de-sante/article/en-ambulatoire-recommandations-covid-19-et-prise-en-charge

5. How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a French national observational survey

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3