Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Author:

Rudoler DavidORCID,Lavergne M RuthORCID,Marshall Emily Gard,Zaheer Juveria,Etches Selene,Good Kimberley P,Grudniewicz AgnesORCID,Katz AlanORCID,Kurdyak PaulORCID,Bolton James,Kaoser RidhwanaORCID,Moravac CatherineORCID,Morrison Jason,Mulsant Benoit,Peterson Sandra,Tibbo Phil G

Abstract

IntroductionThe Canadian population has poor and inequitable access to psychiatric care despite a steady per-capita supply of psychiatrists in most provinces. There is some quantitative evidence that practice style and characteristics vary substantially among psychiatrists. However, how this compares across jurisdictions and implications for workforce planning require further study. A qualitative exploration of psychiatrists’ preferences for practice style and the practice choices that result is also lacking. The goal of this study is to inform psychiatrist workforce planning to improve access to psychiatric care by: (1) developing and evaluating comparable indicators of supply of psychiatric care across provinces, (2) analysing variations and changes in the characteristics of the psychiatrist workforce, including demographics and practice style and (3) studying psychiatrist practice choices and intentions, and the factors that lead to these choices.Methods and analysisA cross-provincial mixed-methods study will be conducted in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia. We will analyse linked-health administrative data within three of the four provinces to develop comparable indicators of supply and characterise psychiatric services at the regional level within provinces. We will use latent profile analysis to estimate the probability that a psychiatrist is in a particular practice style and map the geographical distribution of psychiatrist practices overlayed with measures of need for psychiatric care. We will also conduct in-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with psychiatrists in each province to explore their preferences and practice choices and to inform workforce planning.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by Ontario Tech University Research Ethics Board (16637 and 16795) and institutions affiliated with the study team. We built a team comprising experienced researchers, psychiatrists, medical educators and policymakers in mental health services and workforce planning to disseminate knowledge that will support effective human resource policies to improve access to psychiatric care in Canada.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness;Vigo;Lancet Psychiatry,2016

2. Adult mental health provision in England: a national survey of acute day units;Lamb;BMC Health Serv Res,2019

3. Public health agency of Canada . Report from the Canadian chronic disease surveillance system: mental illness in Canada, 2015. 2015. Available: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/report-canadian-chronic-disease-surveillance-system-mental-illness-canada-2015.html [Accessed 30 Sep 2020].

4. Changes in characteristics and practice patterns of Ontario psychiatrists;Kurdyak;Can J Psychiatry,2017

5. Universal coverage without universal access: a study of psychiatrist supply and practice patterns in Ontario;Kurdyak;Open Med,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3