Students’ and staffs’ views and experiences of asymptomatic testing on a university campus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland: a mixed methods study

Author:

Bauld LindaORCID,Street AliceORCID,Connelly Roxanne,Bevan ImogenORCID,Morlet Corti YazminORCID,Baxter Mats Stage,Stagg Helen RORCID,Christison SarahORCID,Mulherin Tamara,Sinclair Lesley,Aitman TimORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the acceptability of regular asymptomatic testing for SARS-CoV-2 on a university campus using saliva sampling for PCR analysis and the barriers and facilitators to participation.DesignCross-sectional surveys and qualitative semistructured interviews.SettingEdinburgh, Scotland.ParticipantsUniversity staff and students who had registered for the testing programme (TestEd) and provided at least one sample.Results522 participants completed a pilot survey in April 2021 and 1750 completed the main survey (November 2021). 48 staff and students who consented to be contacted for interview took part in the qualitative research. Participants were positive about their experience with TestEd with 94% describing it as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. Facilitators to participation included multiple testing sites on campus, ease of providing saliva samples compared with nasopharyngeal swabs, perceived accuracy compared with lateral flow devices (LFDs) and reassurance of test availability while working or studying on campus. Barriers included concerns about privacy while testing, time to and methods of receiving results compared with LFDs and concerns about insufficient uptake in the university community. There was little evidence that the availability of testing on campus changed the behaviour of participants during a period when COVID-19 restrictions were in place.ConclusionsThe provision of free asymptomatic testing for COVID-19 on a university campus was welcomed by participants and the use of saliva-based PCR testing was regarded as more comfortable and accurate than LFDs. Convenience is a key facilitator of participation in regular asymptomatic testing programmes. Availability of testing did not appear to undermine engagement with public health guidelines.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

H2020 European Research Council

University Of Edinburgh

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. SAGE . SAGE paper on further and higher education. 2020: 46. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/903321/S0599_SAGE_Paper_on_Further_and_Higher_Education_ORIGINAL.pdf

2. Scottish Government . Coronavirus (COVID-19): universities, colleges and community learning and development providers. 2022. Available: www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-universities-colleges-and-community-learning-and-development-providers/ [Accessed 26 Apr 2022].

3. Yamey G , Walensky RP . Covid-19: re-opening universities is high risk. BMJ 2020;370:m3365. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3365

4. Independent SAGE . Independent SAGE statement on Universities in the context of SARS-CoV-2. The Independent SAGE report 11; 2020. Available: www.independentSAGE.org

5. SAGE . Multidisciplinary task and finish group on mass testing: consensus statement for SAGE. 2020: 53. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/914931/s0712-tfms-consensus-statement-sage.pdf

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3