Perspectives of adult offspring of participants recruited to a randomised trial in pregnancy: a qualitative study

Author:

Franke NikeORCID,Wouldes Trecia Ann,Brown Gavin Thomas LumsdenORCID,Ward KimORCID,Rogers Jenny,Harding Jane EORCID

Abstract

BackgroundRoutinely assessed outcomes in paediatric health studies may not reflect families’ priorities. Increasing our understanding of childhood experiences of research participation may contribute to improving the quality of consent and better align study aims with the concerns of relevant communities.ObjectiveTo explore young adults’ views on their participation in medical research during their childhood, specifically around the acceptability of consent and their priorities regarding health, development and well-being as potential trial outcomes.MethodsA qualitative descriptive 20-year follow-up study of a medical trial which aimed to improve outcomes after preterm birth. Semistructured dialogue transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.Setting and participantsSeventeen young adults whose parents consented to their participation in a clinical trial when they were fetuses, and in follow-up studies as preschoolers and school-age children.ResultsOverall, participants expressed comfort with their parents consenting to medical research on their behalf. However, autonomous child assent may not be attainable due to children’s susceptibility to suggestions. Participants generally expressed satisfaction with the outcomes investigated in the follow-up studies, although some suggested other outcomes of interest such as mental health and learning disabilities.ConclusionsCurrent consent procedures were deemed acceptable as parents hold responsibility for making decisions on behalf of their children, and their commitment to their child’s well-being ensures that they make appropriate choices. The outcomes assessed in this trial and health and developmental outcomes in the follow-up assessments aligned well with outcomes of interest to the young adult participants.

Funder

Aotearoa Foundation

Health Research Council of New Zealand

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3