Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants after randomisation to initial resuscitation with lower (FiO2 <0.3) or higher (FiO2 >0.6) initial oxygen levels. An individual patient meta-analysis

Author:

Oei Ju LeeORCID,Kapadia Vishal,Rabi Yacov,Saugstad Ola Didrik,Rook Denise,Vermeulen Marijn JORCID,Boronat Nuria,Thamrin Valerie,Tarnow-Mordi William,Smyth John,Wright Ian M,Lui Kei,van Goudoever Johannes BORCID,Gebski Val,Vento MaximoORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of lower (≤0.3) versus higher (≥0.6) initial fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) for resuscitation on death and/or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in infants <32 weeks’ gestation.DesignMeta-analysis of individual patient data from three randomised controlled trials.SettingNeonatal intensive care units.Patients543 children <32 weeks’ gestation.InterventionRandomisation at birth to resuscitation with lower (≤0.3) or higher (≥0.6) initial FiO2.Outcome measuresPrimary: death and/or NDI at 2 years of age.Secondary: post-hoc non-randomised observational analysis of death/NDI according to 5-minute oxygen saturation (SpO2) below or at/above 80%.ResultsBy 2 years of age, 46 of 543 (10%) children had died. Of the 497 survivors, 84 (17%) were lost to follow-up. Bayley Scale of Infant Development (third edition) assessments were conducted on 377 children. Initial FiO2 was not associated with difference in death and/or disability (difference (95% CI) −0.2%, −7% to 7%, p=0.96) or with cognitive scores <85 (2%, −5% to 9%, p=0.5). Five-minute SpO2 >80% was associated with decreased disability/death (14%, 7% to 21%) and cognitive scores >85 (10%, 3% to 18%, p=0.01). Multinomial regression analysis noted decreased death with 5-minute SpO2 ≥80% (odds (95% CI) 09.62, 0.98 to 0.96) and gestation (0.52, 0.41 to 0.65), relative to children without death or NDI.ConclusionInitial FiO2 was not associated with difference in risk of disability/death at 2 years in infants <32 weeks’ gestation but CIs were wide. Substantial benefit or harm cannot be excluded. Larger randomised studies accounting for patient differences, for example, gestation and gender are urgently needed.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3