Reduction of ileocolic intussusception under sedation or anaesthesia: a systematic review of complications

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the increased use of sedation in children undergoing stressful procedures, reduction of ileocolic intussusception (RII) is usually performed on awake children without any form of sedation.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence of severe complications of RII under sedation or anaesthesia.DesignA systematic review including English language original articles of any date.PatientsChildren undergoing RII (pneumatic or hydrostatic) under sedation or anaesthesia.Data sourcesOvid Embase, Scopus, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the internet search engine Google Scholar.Data extractionThree authors independently reviewed each article for eligibility. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the incidence of intestinal perforation during RII. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of sentinel adverse events defined as death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, permanent neurological deficit and pulmonary aspiration syndrome.ResultsThe search yielded 368 articles. Nine studies with 1391 cases were included in the analysis. Of the nine studies, six had a score of ≤6 stars in the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessment, indicating low-to-moderate quality. Propofol-based sedation was used in 849 (59.2%) cases; 5 (0.6%) had intestinal perforation. Intestinal perforation was not reported in patients who were sedated with other sedatives. One patient had pulmonary aspiration syndrome.ConclusionsAlthough caution remains warranted, current data suggest that the incidence of severe complications due to RII under sedation or anaesthesia is low. Due to the lack of prospective data, it is difficult to ascertain the exact incidence of severe complications.