Septic shock: treatment and modern interpretation of the issue

Author:

Shapoval С. D.ORCID

Abstract

Objective. To analyse the results of treatment of patients with septic shock, which was carried out in accordance with the decisions of the International Conference on Conciliation and the protocols of the Sepsis–3 guideline. Materials and methods. We observed 283 patients with sepsis who were treated in the purulent–septic centre of Zaporizhzhia City Hospital No. 3 during 1991–2024: Group 1 – 193 (68.2%) patients with sepsis treated according to the decisions of the International Conference on Sepsis and Septic Shock (2012, 2004) in 1991–2015, and Group 2 – 90 (31.8%) patients treated according to the protocols of the Sepsis–3 guideline adopted in 2016 in 2016–2024. In group 1, there were 118 (61.1%) patients with sepsis and 75 (38.9%) with septic shock, and in group 2, there were 56 (62.2%) patients with sepsis and 34 (37.8%) with septic shock. In other words, there were 109 patients with septic shock in both groups. Results. Of 75 patients with septic shock of group 1, 56 died, with a mortality rate of 74.7%. Of 34 patients with septic shock in group 2, 23 died, with a mortality rate of 67.6%. In group 1, 17 (30.4%) patients died unoperated in the first hours or day of septic shock, whereas in group 2, there were only 4 (17.4%) such patients. The mortality rate of patients with septic shock who were not operated on was 13.0% lower in group 2 (х2 = 5.63; p<0.0177). Also, the average length of stay of patients with septic shock in group 2 in the hospital was shorter by (4.7 ± 0.24) days (t=4.36; p<0.001). Conclusions. Intensive care in septic shock should be continued until hemodynamic parameters continue to improve, and primary infusion therapy should be limited and guided by an assessment of the body's response to the administration of solutions. Norepinephrine increases preload, systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output, so its use in patients with persistent hypotension is required in the early stages of septic shock. In patients with adequate control of the source of infection, shorter rather than longer antibiotic therapy should be used. The optimal regimen for antibiotic therapy is the use of carbapenems in the highest dosage in combination with linezolid.

Publisher

Liga-Inform, Ltd.

Reference39 articles.

1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-77. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18. PMID: 28101605.

2. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. Erratum in: JAMA. 2016 May 24-31;315(20):2237. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5850. PMID: 26903335; PMCID: PMC5433435.

3. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PMID: 26903338; PMCID: PMC4968574.

4. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. PMID: 31954465; PMCID: PMC6970225.

5. Bassetti M, Rello J, Blasi F, Goossens H, Sotgiu G, Tavoschi L, et al. Systematic review of the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy on outcomes of patients with severe bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Dec;56(6):106184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106184. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PMID: 33045353.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3