Abstract
With the continuous development of teaching reform, personality education has received increasing attention from educators. This paper summarizes the correlation among the Big Five personality traits, learning strategies, and English language proficiency in a macroscopic context of exam-oriented education. The main findings of this paper are: 1) personality is a significant predictor of academic level; 2) educators should instruct students with different personalities to implement corresponding learning strategies; 3) we should overcome the limitations of the EFL education environment, modify the exam-oriented assessment method, to create the conditions to maximize the advantages of personality. This paper makes a certain contribution to the development of personality education. By reading this paper, the relationship between personality traits and academic performance becomes clearer, which can help promote students’ academic proficiency. It also motivates researchers to yield teaching innovations in the fields of integrated personality education and test-oriented education.
Publisher
Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd.
Reference11 articles.
1. Kang, S. (2012). Individual differences in language acquisition: Personality traits and language learning strategies of Korean university students studying English as a foreign language. Ph.D. Thesis. Indiana: Indiana State University.
2. Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1907-1920.
3. Fazeli, S. H. (2012). Use of the Metacognitive English Language Learning Strategies Based on Personality Traits. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 531-539.
4. Šafranj, J., & Gojkov-Rajić, A. (2019). The role of personality traits in the choice and use of language learning strategies. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 28(4), 691-709.
5. Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116–130.