Hauora Māori – Māori health: a right to equal outcomes in primary care

Author:

Sheridan Nicolette,Jansen Rawiri McKree,Harwood Matire,Love Tom,Kenealy Timothy, ,Aguirre-Duarte Nelson,Arroll Bruce,Atmore Carol,Carryer Jenny,Crampton Peter,Dowell Anthony,Fishman Tana,Gauld Robin,Hoare Karen,Jackson Gary,Kerse Ngaire,Lampshire Debra,McBain Lynn,MacRae Jayden,Mills Jane,Øvretveit John,Percival Teuila,Perera Roshan,Roland Martin,Ryan Debbie,Schmidt-Busby Jacqueline,Stokes Tim,Stubbe Maria

Abstract

Abstract Background For more than a century, Māori have experienced poorer health than non-Māori. In 2019 an independent Tribunal found the Government had breached Te Tiriti o Waitangi by “failing to design and administer the current primary health care system to actively address persistent Māori health inequities”. Many Māori (44%) have unmet needs for primary care. Seven models of primary care were identified by the funders and the research team, including Māori-owned practices. We hypothesised patient health outcomes for Māori would differ between models of care. Methods Cross-sectional primary care data were analysed at 30 September 2018. National datasets were linked to general practices at patient level, to measure associations between practice characteristics and patient health outcomes. Primary outcomes: polypharmacy (≥ 55 years), HbA1c testing, child immunisations, ambulatory sensitive hospitalisations (0–14, 45–64 years) and emergency department attendances. Regressions include only Māori patients, across all models of care. Results A total of 660,752 Māori patients were enrolled in 924 practices with 124,854 in 65 Māori-owned practices. Māori practices had: no significant association with HbA1c testing, ambulatory sensitive hospitalisations or ED attendances, and a significant association with lower polypharmacy (3.7% points) and lower childhood immunisations (13.4% points). Māori practices had higher rates of cervical smear and cardiovascular risk assessment, lower rates of HbA1c tests, and more nurse (46%) and doctor (8%) time (FTE) with patients. The average Māori practice had 52% Māori patients compared to 12% across all practices. Māori practices enrolled a higher percentage of children and young people, five times more patients in high deprivation areas, and patients with more multimorbidity. More Māori patients lived rurally (21.5% vs 15%), with a greater distance to the nearest ED. Māori patients were more likely to be dispensed antibiotics or tramadol. Conclusions Māori practices are an expression of autonomy in the face of enduring health system failure. Apart from lower immunisation rates, health outcomes were not different from other models of care, despite patients having higher health risk profiles. Across all models, primary care need was unmet for many Māori, despite increased clinical input. Funding must support under-resourced Māori practices and ensure accountability for the health outcomes of Māori patients in all models of general practice.

Funder

Health Research Council of New Zealand

Ministry of Health, New Zealand

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. Waitangi Tribunal. Hauora: report on stage one of the health services and outcomes kaupapa inquiry (Wai 2575). Lower Hutt. New Zealand: Waitangi Tribunal; 2019.

2. Te hauora Māori i mua – history of Māori health - slow progress, 1920 to 1945. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/te-hauora-maori-i-mua-history-of-maori-health/page-4. Accessed 22 Feb 2023.

3. Te hauora Māori i mua – history of Māori health - changing health, 1945 onwards. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/te-hauora-maori-i-mua-history-of-maori-health/page-4. Accessed 22 Feb 2023.

4. Pomare E. Maori standards of health: a study of the 20 year period 1955–1975. Wellington: Medical Research Council of New Zealand; 1980.

5. Blakely T, Kiro C, Woodward A. Unlocking the numerator-denominator bias. II: adjustments to mortality rates by ethnicity and deprivation during 1991-4. The New Zealand Census-Mortality Study. N Z Med J. 2001;115:43–8.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3