Author:
Reichstein Inska S.,Becker Alischa H.,Johann Sarah,Braunbeck Thomas,Schiwy Sabrina,Hollert Henner,Schiwy Andreas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) was developed to assess the acute fish toxicity of chemicals or environmental samples as a replacement for the Acute Fish Test (AFT) with juvenile fish. However, the FET is not yet established in the regulatory context. One reason is the (postulated) difference between the biotransformation capacities of embryos and juvenile fish.
The present study was designed to develop a procedure for external metabolization of test substances prior to testing in the FET. The workflow allows simultaneous exposure of the embryos to the maternal substances and their potential metabolites throughout the entire exposure period. After a 2 h incubation of the samples at 37 °C with non-toxic concentrations of a rat liver S9 homogenate or an animal-free (ewoS9R) metabolization system, freshly fertilized zebrafish embryos are added and incubated up to 120 h post-fertilization at 26 °C. Five biotransformable model substances (allyl alcohol, benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), chlorpyrifos (CP), tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP) and bisphenol A (BPA)) were evaluated for embryotoxicity with and without external metabolization.
Results
Only for allyl alcohol, external metabolization with both rat S9 and ewoS9R resulted in significantly higher embryotoxicity than under non-premetabolized conditions and, thus, in a better correlation of FET and AFT data. For B[a]P, CP, TDCPP and BPA, there was no relevant difference between data derived from the FET (with and without pre-metabolization) and literature AFT data; even though the FET results with and without pre-metabolization differed significantly for BPA (with rat S9 and ewoS9R) and TDCPP (rat S9 only).
Conclusions
External pre-metabolization appears a promising add-on to the FET protocol to improve the correlation with AFT data of certain biotransformable substances and might help to strengthen the FET as an alternative to the AFT and finally to reduce or replace sentient animals used for acute fish toxicity data in the regulatory context.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R) associated to the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
DBU Promotionsstipendium
RobustNature Excellence Funding
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference105 articles.
1. OECD TG 203. Test no. 203: fish acute toxicity test.: OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. OECD 2019.
2. Burden N, Benstead R, Benyon K, Clook M, Green C, Handley J et al (2020) Key opportunities to replace, reduce, and refine regulatory fish acute toxicity tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 39:2076–2089. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4824
3. Paparella M, Scholz S, Belanger S, Braunbeck T, Bicherel P, Connors K et al (2021) Limitations and uncertainties of acute fish toxicity assessments can be reduced using alternative methods. Altex 38:20–32. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2006051
4. EC No 1907. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the european parliament and of the council: concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH), establishing a european chemicals agency, amending directive 1999/45/EC and repealing council regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and commission regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as council directive 76/769/EEC and commission directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. 2006.
5. ECHA Guidance R.7b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment: Chapter R.7b: endpoint specific guidance. ECHA Guidance. 2017;4:30.