Abstract
Abstract
Background
The objective of this study is to investigate the risk of revision surgery when delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) past 3 months or 6 months after injury.
Materials and methods
A total of 30,280 patients with isolated ACLR were identified in the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry and divided into four groups; ACLR < 3 months, > 3 months, < 6 months, or > 6 months after injury. Primary outcome was revision surgery and secondary outcome were objective and subjective clinical outcome. The 2 year relative risk, crude, and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) were calculated.
Results
Comparing ACLR < 3 months to ACLR > 3 months of injury the 2 year relative risk of revision surgery was found to be 1.81 (95% CI 1.46–2.23; P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.27 (95% CI 1.12–1.44; P < 0.001). Comparing ACLR < 6 months to ACLR > 6 months of injury the 2 year relative risk of revision surgery was found to be 1.61 (95% CI 1.34–1.92; P < 0.001) with an adjusted HR of 1.27 (95% CI 1.15–1.40; P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The risk of revision ACLR surgery was found to be increased when ACLR was performed within 3 months or 6 months of injury compared with later surgery. The 1 year postoperative objective knee laxity and the subjective patient-related outcome was found to be without a clinically significant difference; however, those with early ACLR (< 3 months or < 6 months) were found to have a higher activity level 1 year postoperatively. The information about increased risk of revision when having early surgery should be informed to patients when deciding timing of ACLR treatment.
Level of evidence: II.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Ahn JH, Lee SH (2016) Risk factors for knee instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2936–2942
2. Andernord D, Björnsson H, Petzold M, Eriksson BI, Forssblad M, Karlsson J et al (2014) Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the swedish national knee ligament register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med 42:1574–1582
3. Arida C, Tsikrikas CG, Mastrokalos DS, Panagopoulos A, Vlamis J, Triantafyllopoulos IK (2021) Comparison of bone-patella tendon-bone and four-strand hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Cureus 13:e19197
4. Arneja S, Leith J (2009) Review article: Validity of the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 17:77–79
5. Baba R, Kondo E, Iwasaki K, Joutoku Z, Onodera J, Onodera T et al (2019) Impact of surgical timing on clinical outcomes in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts. Orthop J Sports Med 7:2325967119880553