Abstract
AbstractThe UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has called for evidence on the roles that different stakeholders play in reproducibility and research integrity. Of central priority are proposals for improving research integrity and quality, as well as guidance and support for researchers. In response to this, we argue that there is one important component of research integrity that is often absent from discussion: the pedagogical consequences of how we teach, mentor, and supervise students through open scholarship. We justify the need to integrate open scholarship principles into research training within higher education and argue that pedagogical communities play a key role in fostering an inclusive culture of open scholarship. We illustrate these benefits by presenting theFramework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT), an international grassroots community whose goal is to provide support, resources, visibility, and advocacy for the adoption of principled, open teaching and mentoring practices, whilst generating conversations about the ethics and social impact of higher-education pedagogy. Representing a diverse group of early-career researchers and students across specialisms, we advocate for greater recognition of and support for pedagogical communities, and encourage all research stakeholders to engage with these communities to enable long-term, sustainable change.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. Parsons S, Azevedo F, Elsherif MM, Guay S, Shahim ON, Govaart GH, et al. Community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nat Hum Behav. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4.
2. Pownall M, Azevedo F, Aldoh A, Elsherif MM, Vasilev MR, Pennington CR, et al. Embedding open and reproducible science into teaching: a bank of lesson plans and resources. Scholarsh Teach Learn Psychol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000307.
3. Wellcome Trust. What researchers think about the culture they work in. 2021. https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2021.
4. Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DV, Button KS, Chambers CD, Du Sert NP, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
5. Vazire S. Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(4):411–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献