Author:
Stone Matthew D.,Mercincavage Melissa,Wileyto E. Paul,Tan Andy S.L.,Audrain-McGovern Janet,Villanti Andrea C.,Strasser Andrew A.
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Plain packaging and graphic warning labels are two regulatory strategies that may impact cigarette risk beliefs and reduce consumption, but data are needed to better understand how smokers respond to such regulations.
Methods
Adult, daily, Marlboro non-menthol smokers (Red [n = 141] or Gold [n = 43]) completed a mixed factorial randomized trial. Participants smoked their usual cigarettes during baseline (5-days) and were randomized to receive cigarette packs with a warning label manipulation (graphic vs. text-only). Within each warning label condition, participants completed three within-subjects pack color manipulations (red, gold, plain), each lasting 15 days. Participants were blinded to the fact that all packs contained their usual cigarettes. Mixed-effects models examined between- and within-subject differences on risk beliefs, product perceptions, and smoking behavior.
Results
Warning type and package color did not impact cigarette consumption or subjective ratings. However, use increased in all conditions (2.59–3.59 cigarettes per day) relative to baseline. While smokers largely held correct risk beliefs at baseline (Mean = 6.02, SE = 0.17, Range:0–8), the cumulative number of incorrect or uncertain cigarette risk beliefs increased from baseline in all pack color manipulations in the text (IRR range = 1.70–2.16) and graphic (IRR range = 1.31–1.70) warning conditions. Across all pack color periods, those in the graphic (vs. text) warning condition had reduced odds of reporting their study cigarettes as ‘safer’ than regular cigarettes (OR range = 0.22–0.32).
Conclusions
Pack color modification may increase uncertainty about several key cigarette risk beliefs, though graphic warnings may attenuate these effects. Regulatory agencies could consider supporting policy changes with information campaigns to maximize public knowledge.
Trial registration
November 25, 2014; Registration number: NCT02301351.
Funder
National Institute on Drug Abuse
National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference58 articles.
1. Creamer MR, Wang TW, Babb S, et al. Tobacco product use and cessation indicators among adults—United States, 2018. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(45):1013.
2. US Department of Health and Human. Services The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General: Atlanta, GA, 2014.
3. Ngo A, Cheng K-W, Shang C, et al. Global evidence on the association between cigarette graphic warning labels and cigarette Smoking prevalence and consumption. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):421.
4. Food and Drug Administration DoHaHS. Required warnings for cigarette packages and advertisements. Final rule. Fed Reg. 2011;76(120):36628–777.
5. Tobacco Products; Required Warnings for Cigarette Packages and Advertisements. ; Delayed Effective Date: Food and Drug Administration; [Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/01/2022-11568/tobacco-products-required-warnings-for-cigarette-packages-and-advertisements-delayed-effective-date accessed 17 Aug 2022.