Author:
Jeong Kyuhyoung,Yoon Jiyeon,Cho Heeran J.,Kim Sunghee,Jang Jihyun
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Korean government has established various policies to counter the low fertility rate since the mid-2000s, but it still has the lowest fertility rate among OECD member countries. This study investigated the relationship between changes in the Korean fertility rate and policies to encourage fertility.
Methods
This study utilized data of the total fertility rate of 250 local governments between 2014 and 2018, and a casebook of local government birth promotion policies. The dependent variable was fertility rate, and the independent variable was fertility promotion policy. Using SPSS 25.0 and M-plus 8.0 programs, descriptive statistical analysis and latent growth modeling were conducted. An unconditional quadratic function change model was selected as a final model of this study.
Results
The average of the initial fertility rate and the linear rate of change in the Korean fertility rate, and the rate of change of the quadratic function were all statistically significant, meaning that the fertility rate of decline increases over time. Also, the linear rate of change and the quadratic function change rate were significant, showing significant differences in the initial level and rate of change of the fertility rate between local governments. Among fertility policies, only the in-kind policy had a significant effect on the initial value of the fertility rate, meaning that the higher the number of in-kind policies, the higher the fertility rate.
Conclusion
This study is crucial as it examined the changes in the fertility rate of Korean local governments as well as the policy factors affecting the fertility rate at a quantitative level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference40 articles.
1. Morgan SP. Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography. 2003;40(4):589–603. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0037.
2. Choi EY Policies related to low fertility in advanced countries. KDI Economic Information and Education Center. 2006. OECD. Family Database. 2018.
3. Shin YJ. Policy response to low fertility in Korea: a look through OECD indicators. Res Brief. 2018;27:1–7.
4. Lee J. The burden of household education expenditures in Korea and eight european countries. Health Welfare Forum. 2022;309(7):31–42.
5. Kim H, Cho M An Analysis of Labor Transition Types of Reproductive Women-Focused on the Group-Centered Trend Method. Proceedings of the Summer Conference of the Korean Public Administration Association, 2022, 1117–1148.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献