Author:
Li Xujun,Su Xin,Wei Li,Zhang Junhang,Shi Donglei,Wang Zhaojun
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to analyze the trends and burden of occupational exposure to asbestos in the United States (U.S.) from 1990 to 2019, focusing on mortality rates, geographic distribution, age and sex patterns, and causes of death.
Methods
Data on the number of deaths attributable to occupational exposure to asbestos were collected from 1990 to 2019 in the U.S. Joinpoint analysis was conducted to assess trends over time, and regression models were applied to calculate annual percentage changes (APC) and annual average percentage changes (AAPC). Geographic distribution was examined using mapping techniques. Age and sex patterns were analyzed, and causes of death were identified based on available data.
Results
From 1990 to 2019, the overall number of deaths due to occupational exposure to asbestos in the U.S. increased by 20.2%. However, age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) rates (ASDR) exhibited a decline over the same period. Geographic analysis revealed differences in the number of deaths across states in 2019, with California reporting the highest number of fatalities. Age-specific mortality and DALYs showed an increase with age, peaking in older age groups. Tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer were the leading causes of death attributed to asbestos exposure, with increasing trends observed over the past five years.
Conclusion
The study highlights significant trends and burden in occupational exposure to asbestos in the U.S., including overall increases in mortality rates, declining ASMR and ASDR, geographic disparities, age and sex patterns, and shifts in causes of death. These findings underscore the importance of continued monitoring and preventive measures to mitigate the burden of asbestos-related diseases.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Asbestos. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/asbestos/default.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2024.
2. IARC, Asbestos. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, vol. 14. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1977. p.106.
3. Im S, Youn KW, Shin D, Lee MJ, Choi SJ. Review of carcinogenicity of asbestos and proposal of approval standards of an occupational cancer caused by asbestos in Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2015;27:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-015-0080-1.
4. WHO, Asbestos. Feb : elimination of asbestos-related diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/asbestos-elimination-of-asbestos-related-diseases. Accessed 22 2024.
5. Chen J, Wang C, Zhang J, Zhang T, Liang H, Mao S, et al. A comparative study of the disease burden attributable to asbestos in Brazil, China, Kazakhstan, and Russia between 1990 and 2019. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14437-6.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献