Author:
Cassinelli Emma H.,McKinley Michelle C.,Kent Lisa,Eastwood Kelly-Ann,Schoenaker Danielle A. J. M.,Trew David,Stoikidou Theano,McGowan Laura
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Preconception health has the potential to improve parental, pregnancy and infant outcomes. This scoping review aims to (1) provide an overview of the strategies, policies, guidelines, frameworks, and recommendations available in the UK and Ireland that address preconception health and care, identifying common approaches and health-influencing factors that are targeted; and (2) conduct an audit to explore the awareness and use of resources found in the scoping review amongst healthcare professionals, to validate and contextualise findings relevant to Northern Ireland.
Methods
Grey literature resources were identified through Google Advanced Search, NICE, OpenAire, ProQuest and relevant public health and government websites. Resources were included if published, reviewed, or updated between January 2011 and May 2022. Data were extracted into Excel and coded using NVivo. The review design included the involvement of the “Healthy Reproductive Years” Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement advisory panel.
Results
The searches identified 273 resources, and a subsequent audit with healthcare professionals in Northern Ireland revealed five additional preconception health-related resources. A wide range of resource types were identified, and preconception health was often not the only focus of the resources reviewed. Resources proposed approaches to improve preconception health and care, such as the need for improved awareness and access to care, preconceptual counselling, multidisciplinary collaborations, and the adoption of a life-course approach. Many behavioural (e.g., folic acid intake, smoking), biomedical (e.g., mental and physical health conditions), and environmental and social (e.g., deprivation) factors were identified and addressed in the resources reviewed. In particular, pre-existing physical health conditions were frequently mentioned, with fewer resources addressing psychological factors and mental health. Overall, there was a greater focus on women’s, rather than men’s, behaviours.
Conclusions
This scoping review synthesised existing resources available in the UK and Ireland to identify a wide range of common approaches and factors that influence preconception health and care. Efforts are needed to implement the identified resources (e.g., strategies, guidelines) to support people of childbearing age to access preconception care and optimise their preconception health.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Women of reproductive age (15-49 years) population (thousands). No date. https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/women-of-reproductive-age-(15-49-years)-population-(thousands). Accessed 29 May 2023.
2. World Health Organization. Policy brief: preconception care – maximising the gains for maternal and child health. 2013. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-MCA-13.02. Accessed 22 Apr 2022.
3. Shawe J, Delbaere I, Ekstrand M, et al. Preconception care policy, guidelines, recommendations and services across six European countries: Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2014.990088.
4. Public Health England. Making the case for preconception care. 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preconception-care-making-the-case. Accessed 5 Dec 2022.
5. Broussard DL, Sappenfield WB, Fussman C, et al. Core state preconception health indicators: a voluntary, multi-state selection process. Matern Child Health J. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0575-x.