Early childhood developmental status and its associated factors in Bangladesh: a comparison of two consecutive nationally representative surveys

Author:

Hasan Mohammad NayeemORCID,Babu Md. RashedORCID,Chowdhury Muhammad Abdul BakerORCID,Rahman Mohammad MeshbahurORCID,Hasan NafiulORCID,Kabir RussellORCID,Uddin Md JamalORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Inadequate cognitive and socio-emotional development in children leads to physical and mental illness. We aimed to investigate the status of early childhood development (ECD) and its associated factors. Additionally, aimed to compare the changes of significantly associated factors using two multiple indicator cluster surveys (MICS) in Bangladesh. Methods We used data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) 2012 and 2019 nationally representative surveys. A total of 17,494 children aged 36–59 months were included in the analysis. The outcome variable was ECD status: either developmentally on-track or not. We used bivariable analysis and crude and adjusted multivariable logistic models to assess the ECD status and its associated factors. Results Comparing both MICS surveys, the overall and individual domains of ECD status improved from 2012 (65.46%) to 2019 (74.86%), and the indicators of child literacy-numeracy domain improved from 21.2 to 28.8%, physical domain improved from 92.2 to 98.4%, and social-emotional domain improved from 68.4 to 72.7%. The learning approach domain was 87.5% in 2012 and increased to 91.4% in 2019. According to the adjusted logistic model in both surveys (2012 and 2019), the age of 4 years had an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.61 and 1.78 times higher developmentally on track than the age of 3. Female children were 1.42 (in 2012) and 1.44 (in 2019) times more developmentally on track than males. Compared to mothers with only primary education, children raised by mothers with secondary or higher education were 1.77 and 1.50 times more on track in their development. Moreover, Children from affluent families had 1.32- and 1.26 times higher odds- on track than those from the poorest families. Families with books had 1.50 and 1.53 times higher developmentally on track than their counterparts. Conclusion and recommendation In summary, our study shows that the overall ECD status improved between MICS 2012 and MICS 2019. Important factors influence ECD status, including early childhood education programs, families’ possession of children’s books, mothers’ educational level, and wealth index. The findings of our study will help making necessary public health-related initiatives in Bangladesh to improve ECD program.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference38 articles.

1. McCoy DC, et al. Early Childhood Developmental Status in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: National, Regional, and global prevalence estimates using Predictive modeling. PLOS Med. Jun. 2016;13(6):e1002034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002034.

2. WHO., “Early child development,” WHO, 2017, Accessed: Jan. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/child/development/en/.

3. Currie J, Vogl T. Early-Life Health and adult circumstance in developing countries. Camb MA Sep. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18371.

4. Heckman JJ. “The economics, technology, and neuroscience of human capability formation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, vol. 104, no. 33, pp. 13250–13255, Aug. 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701362104.

5. Junek W. “The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood,” J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 180, 2007, Accessed: Jan. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247463/.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3