Author:
Beese Florian,Wachtler Benjamin,Grabka Markus M.,Blume Miriam,Kersjes Christina,Gutu Robert,Mauz Elvira,Hoebel Jens
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Psychosocial stress is considered a risk factor for physical and mental ill-health. Evidence on socioeconomic inequalities with regard to the psychosocial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany is still limited. We aimed to investigate how pandemic-induced psychosocial stress (PIPS) in different life domains differed between socioeconomic groups.
Methods
Data came from the German Corona-Monitoring nationwide study – wave 2 (RKI-SOEP-2, November 2021–February 2022). PIPS was assessed using 4-point Likert scales with reference to the following life domains: family, partnership, own financial situation, psychological well-being, leisure activity, social life and work/school situation. Responses were dichotomised into “not stressed/slightly stressed/rather stressed” (0) versus “highly stressed” (1). The sample was restricted to the working-age population in Germany (age = 18–67 years, n = 8,402). Prevalence estimates of high PIPS were calculated by sex, age, education and income. Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) were estimated using Poisson regression to investigate the association between education/income and PIPS; high education and income were the reference groups.
Results
The highest stress levels were reported in the domains social life and leisure activity. Women and younger participants reported high stress levels more frequently. The highest inequalities were found regarding people’s own financial situation, and PIPS was higher in low vs. high income groups (PR 5.54, 95% CI 3.61–8.52). Inequalities were also found regarding partnerships with higher PIPS in low vs. high education groups (PR 1.68, 95% CI 1.13–2.49) – and psychological well-being with higher PIPS in low vs. high income groups (PR 1.52, 95% CI 1.14–2.04).
Conclusion
Socioeconomic inequalities in PIPS were found for different life domains. Generally, psychosocial support and preventive interventions to help people cope with stress in a pandemic context should be target-group-specific, addressing the particular needs and circumstances of certain socioeconomic groups.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–60. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397.
2. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Our World In Data. 2020. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus. Accessed 2023/04/19.
3. Khanijahani A, Iezadi S, Gholipour K, Azami-Aghdash S, Naghibi D. A systematic review of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20(1):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01582-4.
4. World Bank Group. World development report 2022. Washington, D.C., DC: World Bank; 2022.
5. Müller K-U, Samtleben C, Schmieder J, Wrohlich K. Corona-Krise erschwert Vereinbarkeit Von Beruf und Familie Vor Allem für Mütter: Erwerbstätige Eltern sollten entlastet werden. DIW Wochenbericht. 2020;87(19):331–40. https://doi.org/10.18723/diw_wb:2020-19-1.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sozial gerecht: Gesundheit – Umwelt – Klima;Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz;2024-08-14