Abstract
Abstract
Background
The global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has become the most fundamental threat to human health. In the absence of vaccines and effective therapeutical solutions, non-pharmaceutic intervention has become a major way for controlling the epidemic. Gentle mitigation interventions are able to slow down the epidemic but not to halt it well. While strict suppression interventions are efficient for controlling the epidemic, long-term measures are likely to have negative impacts on economics and people’s daily live. Hence, dynamically balancing suppression and mitigation interventions plays a fundamental role in manipulating the epidemic curve.
Methods
We collected data of the number of infections for several countries during the COVID-19 pandemics and found a clear phenomenon of periodic waves of infection. Based on the observation, by connecting the infection level with the medical resources and a tolerance parameter, we propose a mathematical model to understand impacts of combining intervention measures on the epidemic dynamics.
Results
Depending on the parameters of the medical resources, tolerance level, and the starting time of interventions, the combined intervention measure dynamically changes with the infection level, resulting in a periodic wave of infections controlled below an accepted level. The study reveals that, (a) with an immediate, strict suppression, the numbers of infections and deaths are well controlled with a significant reduction in a very short time period; (b) an appropriate, dynamical combination of suppression and mitigation may find a feasible way in reducing the impacts of epidemic on people’s live and economics.
Conclusions
While the assumption of interventions deployed with a cycle of period in the model is limited and unrealistic, the phenomenon of periodic waves of infections in reality is captured by our model. These results provide helpful insights for policy-makers to dynamically deploy an appropriate intervention strategy to effectively battle against the COVID-19.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference39 articles.
1. He D, Zhao S, Xu X, Lin Q, Zhuang Z, Cao P, Wang M, Lou Y, Xiao L, Wu Y. Low dispersion in the infectiousness of covid-19 cases implies difficulty in control. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1558.
2. Imai N, Cori A, Dorigatti I, Baguelin M, Donnelly CA, Riley S, Ferguson NM. Report 3: Transmissibility of 2019-nCoV. Imp Coll Lond. 2020. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-3-transmissibility-of-covid-19/. Accessed 25 Jan 2020.
3. Lin Q, Zhao S, Gao D, Lou Y, Yang S, S.Musa S, H.Wang M. A conceptual model for the coronavirus disease 2019(covid-19) outbreak in wuhan, china with individual reaction and governmental action. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 93:211–6.
4. Read JM, Bridgen JRE, Cummings DAT, Ho A, Jewell CP. Novel coronavirus 2019-ncov: early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic predictions. MedRxiv 2020:2020.01.23.20018549. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.23.20018549.
5. Eikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboi E. To mask or not to mask: modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the covid-19 pandemic. Infect Dis Model. 2020; 5:293–308.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献