Abstract
Abstract
Background
During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures.
Methods and analysis
This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Discussion
Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat.
Trial registration
Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference43 articles.
1. de Varebeke SP, Govaerts P, Cox T, Deben K, Ketelslagers K, Waelkens B. Fixation of cochlear implants: an evidence-based review of literature. B-ENT. 2012;8(2):85–94 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22896927.
2. Yoshikawa N, Hirsch B, Telischi FF. Cochlear implant fixation and dura exposure. Otology & Neurotology. 2010;31(8):1211–4.
3. Alexander NS, Caron E, Woolley AL. Fixation methods in pediatric cochlear implants: retrospective review of an evolution of 3 techniques. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(3):427–30.
4. Filipo R, Covelli E, D’elia C, Mancini P. Delayed retroauricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011;12(4):248–50.
5. Dodson KM, Maiberger PG, Sismanis A. Intracranial complications of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(4):459–62.