Tolerability and efficacy of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in elderly with major depression. Study protocol of the VESPA study: a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial
Author:
Ostuzzi Giovanni, Gastaldon ChiaraORCID, Barbato Angelo, D’Avanzo Barbara, Tettamanti Mauro, Monti Igor, Aguglia Andrea, Aguglia Eugenio, Alessi Maria Chiara, Amore Mario, Bartoli Francesco, Biondi Massimo, Bortolaso Paola, Callegari Camilla, Carrà Giuseppe, Caruso Rosangela, Cavallotti Simone, Crocamo Cristina, D’Agostino Armando, De Fazio Pasquale, Di Natale Chiara, Giusti Laura, Grassi Luigi, Martinotti Giovanni, Nosé Michela, Papola Davide, Purgato Marianna, Rodolico Alessandro, Roncone Rita, Tarsitani Lorenzo, Turrini Giulia, Zanini Elisa, Amaddeo Francesco, Ruggeri Mirella, Barbui Corrado
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Depression is a highly prevalent condition in the elderly, with a vast impact on quality of life, life expectancy, and medical outcomes. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in this condition and, although generally safe, tolerability issues cannot be overlooked. Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with a novel mechanism of action. Based on studies to date, it may have a promising tolerability profile in the elderly, as it does not adversely affect psychomotor or cognitive performance and does not alter cardiovascular and endocrine parameters. The present study aims to assess the tolerability profile of vortioxetine in comparison with the SSRIs considered as a single group in elderly participants with depression. The rate of participants withdrawing from treatment due to adverse events after 6 months of follow up will be the primary outcome.
Methods and analysis
This is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA - Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco). Thirteen Italian Community Psychiatric Services will consecutively enrol elderly participants suffering from an episode of major depression over a period of 12 months. Participants will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up. At each time point, the following validated rating scales will be administered: Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC), EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Blessed Test (SBT), and Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index (CACI). Outcome assessors and the statistician will be masked to treatment allocation. A total of 358 participants (179 in each group) will be enrolled.
Ethics and dissemination
This study will fully adhere to the ICH E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Participants’ data will be managed and safeguarded according to the European Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. An external Ethical Advisory Board will help guarantee high ethical standards.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03779789, Registered on 19 December 2018. Submitted on 19 December. EudraCT number: 2018–001444-66.
Trial status
Protocol version 1.5; 09/06/2018. Recruitment started In February 2019 and it is ongoing. It is expected to end approximately on 30 September 2021.
Funder
Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Ministero della Salute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference62 articles.
1. GBD. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1659–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31679-8. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP). Current depression among adults-United States, 2006 and 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(38):1229–35. 3. Ames D. Depression among elderly residents of local-authority residential homes. Its nature and the efficacy of intervention. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;156:667–75. 4. Eden J. The mental health and substance use workforce for older adults. In whose hands? Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2012. 5. Heisel MJ, Grek A, Moore SL, Jackson F, Vincent G. National guidelines for seniors’ mental health: the assessment of suicide risk and prevention of suicide. Can J Geriatr. 2006;9(2):s65–70.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|