Tolerability and efficacy of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in elderly with major depression. Study protocol of the VESPA study: a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial

Author:

Ostuzzi Giovanni,Gastaldon ChiaraORCID,Barbato Angelo,D’Avanzo Barbara,Tettamanti Mauro,Monti Igor,Aguglia Andrea,Aguglia Eugenio,Alessi Maria Chiara,Amore Mario,Bartoli Francesco,Biondi Massimo,Bortolaso Paola,Callegari Camilla,Carrà Giuseppe,Caruso Rosangela,Cavallotti Simone,Crocamo Cristina,D’Agostino Armando,De Fazio Pasquale,Di Natale Chiara,Giusti Laura,Grassi Luigi,Martinotti Giovanni,Nosé Michela,Papola Davide,Purgato Marianna,Rodolico Alessandro,Roncone Rita,Tarsitani Lorenzo,Turrini Giulia,Zanini Elisa,Amaddeo Francesco,Ruggeri Mirella,Barbui Corrado

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Depression is a highly prevalent condition in the elderly, with a vast impact on quality of life, life expectancy, and medical outcomes. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in this condition and, although generally safe, tolerability issues cannot be overlooked. Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with a novel mechanism of action. Based on studies to date, it may have a promising tolerability profile in the elderly, as it does not adversely affect psychomotor or cognitive performance and does not alter cardiovascular and endocrine parameters. The present study aims to assess the tolerability profile of vortioxetine in comparison with the SSRIs considered as a single group in elderly participants with depression. The rate of participants withdrawing from treatment due to adverse events after 6 months of follow up will be the primary outcome. Methods and analysis This is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA - Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco). Thirteen Italian Community Psychiatric Services will consecutively enrol elderly participants suffering from an episode of major depression over a period of 12 months. Participants will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up. At each time point, the following validated rating scales will be administered: Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC), EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Blessed Test (SBT), and Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index (CACI). Outcome assessors and the statistician will be masked to treatment allocation. A total of 358 participants (179 in each group) will be enrolled. Ethics and dissemination This study will fully adhere to the ICH E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Participants’ data will be managed and safeguarded according to the European Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. An external Ethical Advisory Board will help guarantee high ethical standards. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03779789, Registered on 19 December 2018. Submitted on 19 December. EudraCT number: 2018–001444-66. Trial status Protocol version 1.5; 09/06/2018. Recruitment started In February 2019 and it is ongoing. It is expected to end approximately on 30 September 2021.

Funder

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Ministero della Salute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference62 articles.

1. GBD. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1659–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31679-8.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP). Current depression among adults-United States, 2006 and 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(38):1229–35.

3. Ames D. Depression among elderly residents of local-authority residential homes. Its nature and the efficacy of intervention. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;156:667–75.

4. Eden J. The mental health and substance use workforce for older adults. In whose hands? Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2012.

5. Heisel MJ, Grek A, Moore SL, Jackson F, Vincent G. National guidelines for seniors’ mental health: the assessment of suicide risk and prevention of suicide. Can J Geriatr. 2006;9(2):s65–70.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3