Author:
Currò Jessica M.,Santonocito Cristina,Merola Federica,Messina Simone,Sanfilippo Marco,Brancati Serena,Drago Filippo,Sanfilippo Filippo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Propofol is the most commonly used hypnotic agent used during sedation and general anesthesia (GA) practice, offering faster recovery compared to benzodiazepines. However, cardiovascular impact of propofol and pain at injection are commonly encountered side effects. Ciprofol is a novel disubstituted phenol derivative, and there is growing evidence regarding its clinical use.
Methods
We conducted a systematic literature search (updated on 23 July 2023) to evaluate safety and efficacy of ciprofol in comparison to propofol in patients undergoing procedures under sedation or GA. We focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, extrapolating data on onset and offset, and on the side effects and the pain at injection.
Results
The search revealed 14 RCTs, all conducted in China. Eight RCTs studied patients undergoing sedation, and six focused on GA. Bolus of ciprofol for sedation or induction of GA varied from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg. In four studies using ciprofol for maintenance of GA, it was 0.8–2.4 mg/kg/h. Ciprofol pharmacokinetics seemed characterized by slower onset and offset as compared to propofol. Pain during injection was less frequent in the ciprofol group in all the 13 studies reporting it. Eight studies reported “adverse events” as a pooled outcome, and in five cases, the incidence was higher in the propofol group, not different in the remaining ones. Occurrence of hypotension was the most commonly investigated side effects, and it seemed less frequent with ciprofol.
Conclusion
Ciprofol for sedation or GA may be safer than propofol, though its pharmacokinetics may be less advantageous.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Morelli A, Sanfilippo F, Arnemann P, Hessler M, Kampmeier TG, D’Egidio A et al (2019) The effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on norepinephrine requirements in septic shock patients: a crossover trial. Crit Care Med 47(2):e89–e95
2. Čižmáriková R, Habala L, Markulia M (2023) General intravenous anesthetics - pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and chiral properties. Ceska Slov Farm 72(4):155–164
3. Malagutti N, McGinness G, Nithyanandam DA (2023) Real-time personalised pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in propofol anesthesia through Bayesian inference. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2023:1–6
4. Bardol M, Pan S, Walker SM, Standing JF, Dawes JM (2023) Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling of analgesics and sedatives in children. Paediatr Anaesth 33(10):781–792
5. Hawthorne C, Shaw M, Campbell R, Sutcliffe N, McKelvie S, Schraag S (2022) Clinical validation of the covariates pharmacokinetic model for propofol in an adult population. Drugs R D 22(4):289–300
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献