Abstract
Abstract
There are several reports of Australasian tektites found within a stratum called “laterite” layer widely distributed in Indochina. However, it has been debated whether these tektites are in situ or reworked. This uncertainty is because a detailed description of their field occurrence is lacking. Here, we describe the detailed occurrence of a cluster of tektite fragments recovered from the “laterite” layer near Huai Om, northeastern Thailand, and demonstrate the evidence of in situ occurrence of the tektites. At least 331 tektite fragments with a total weight of 713 g were found from a 40 × 30 cm area with 10 cm thickness in the uppermost part of the “laterite” layer. The very angular shapes and very poorly sorted nature of the fragments, restoration of larger tektite fragments into one ellipsoidal Muong Nong-type (MN) tektite mass, and the similar chemical composition of the fragments suggest that these MN tektite fragments represent a tektite mass that fragmented in situ. The fact that the fragments were found within the “laterite” layer is inconsistent with a previous interpretation that the upper surface of the “laterite” layer is a paleo-erosional surface, on which the tektites are reworked. The size distribution of the fragments is bi-fractal following two power laws in the range from 10 to 26 mm and from 26 to 37 mm, respectively, with fractal dimensions (Ds) of 2.2 and 7.5. The Ds for the coarse fraction of the tektite fragments is larger than the Ds for rock fragments generated by rockfalls and rock avalanches and similar to the Ds for the coarser fraction fragments generated by high-speed impact experiments, suggesting that the tektite fragments were formed through intense fragmentation by a relatively high energetic process. The occurrence of the fragments forming a cluster indicates that the fragments were not moved apart significantly after fragmentation and burial. Based on these results, we concluded that the mass of a tektite was fragmented at the time of the landing on the ground after traveling a ballistic trajectory and has not been disturbed further.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Fujiwara Natural History Foundation
Leverhulme Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference42 articles.
1. Barnes VE, Pitakpaivan K (1962) Origin of Indochinite tektites. Proc Natl Acad Sci 48(6):947–955
2. Bjørk TE, Mair K, Austrheim H (2009) Quantifying granular material and deformation: advantages of combining grain size, shape, and mineral phase recognition analysis. J Struct Geol 31(7):637–653.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.03.020
3. Carling PA, Tada T, Tada R, Songtham W, Cresswell A, Sanderson D, Porat N, Duangkrayom J, Meshkova L, Croudace I, Darby S, Fan X (2020) Regionally-extensive ejecta layer of the Australian tektite strewn-field: the MIS 20 large meteorite impact in Indochina. Presented at the JpGU-AGU joint meeting 2020, 12-16 July 2020.
4. Crosta GB, Frattini P, Fusi N (2007) Fragmentation in the Val Pola rock avalanche, Italian Alps. J Geophys Res 112(1):1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000455
5. Domokos G, Kun F, Sipos AA, Szabó T (2015) Universality of fragment shapes. Sci Rep 5:9147.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09147
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献